13 September 2012, in the Senate
Motion on the Government's position regarding the possible reconsideration of the 2012-2015 Stability Programs and the 2012 National Reform Program, within the framework of a reconfiguration of alliances in the European Union for the better defense of the interests of our country.
More votes against 66 yes · 151 no · 7 abst.More votes against: 151 no and 66 yes, a margin of 85. 7 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 16· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
66 in favour, 151 against. 7 abstentions.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción sobre la posición del Gobierno respecto a la eventual reconsideración de los Programas de Estabilidad 2012-2015 y Nacional de Reformas 2012, en el marco de una recomposición de alianzas en la Unión Europea para la mejor defensa de los intereses de nuestro país.
- Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 16
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.