6 June 2012, in the Senate
Motion on the provisions for the review of the judicial fees system in second instance.
More votes against 77 yes · 155 no · 11 abst.More votes against: 155 no and 77 yes, a margin of 78. 11 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1006 of sitting 12· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
77 in favour, 155 against. 11 abstentions.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción sobre las previsiones para la revisión del sistema de tasas judiciales en segunda instancia.
- Senate, vote 1006 of sitting 12
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.