Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

5 June 2012, in the Senate

Motion urging the Government to modify the ecological flows proposed in the draft Hydrological Plan of the Ebro Hydrographic District for the lower river stretch.

More votes against 23 yes · 157 no · 67 abst.

More votes against: 157 no and 23 yes, a margin of 134. 67 abstentions.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1002 of sitting 12· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

23 in favour, 157 against. 67 abstentions.

This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.

This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a la modificación de los caudales ecológicos propuestos en el proyecto de Plan Hidrológico de la Demarcación Hidrográfica del Ebro para el tramo inferior del río.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.