8 May 2012, in the Senate
Motion calling on the Government to submit to the Chamber a semi-annual report on the economic effects of the application of Royal Decree-Law 3/2012, of 10 February, on urgent measures for the reform of the labour market.
More votes against 78 yes · 154 no · 8 abst.More votes against: 154 no and 78 yes, a margin of 76. 8 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 10· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
78 in favour, 154 against. 8 abstentions.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a presentar ante la Cámara un informe semestral sobre los efectos económicos de la aplicación del Real Decreto Ley 3/2012, de 10 de febrero, de medidas urgentes para la reforma del mercado laboral.
- Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 10
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.