8 May 2012, in the Senate
Motion calling on the Government to make the necessary amendments to current legislation in order to develop fishing-tourism activities.
More votes against 91 yes · 155 no · 3 abst.More votes against: 155 no and 91 yes, a margin of 64. 3 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1000 of sitting 10· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
91 in favour, 155 against. 3 abstentions.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a la realización de las modificaciones necesarias en la legislación vigente a fin de desarrollar las actividades de pesca-turismo.
- Senate, vote 1000 of sitting 10
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.