6 April 2017, in the Congreso

Proposals 36, 38, 39 and 41.

More votes against 90 yes · 243 no · 2 abst.

More votes against: 243 no and 90 yes, a margin of 153. 2 abstentions and 15 did not vote.

Admitted step 2 of 7 Report on the state, functioning, and activities of the General Council of the Judiciary and the Courts and Tribunals of Justice, as well as the Report of the Supreme Court, corresponding to the year 2015.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

The chamber

Who voted how?

90 in favour, 243 against. 2 abstentions and 15 did not vote. 5 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Sin grupo. Against, most of Socialista, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	84	81 against · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto	18	12 in favour · 3 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos	32	30 against · 2 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em	67	64 in favour · 3 did not vote
GER	9	9 in favour
Sin grupo	1	1 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	134	129 against · 5 did not vote

Sources

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuestas 36, 38, 39 y 41.

Congreso de los Diputados, vote 32 of sitting 45
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.