6 September 2018, in the Congreso
Request from the Constitutional Committee, to grant an extension of the deadline given to the Subcommittee for electoral reform, until 31 December 2018, for the issuance of its report.
By assentCarried by assent: nobody asked for a vote.
Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished Subcommittee for electoral reform.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 137· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
0 in favour, 0 against.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each deputy’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Solicitud de la Comisión Constitucional, para que se conceda una prórroga del plazo otorgado a la Subcomisión para la reforma electoral, hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2018, para la emisión de su informe.
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 137
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.