19 July 2012, in the Congreso

Point 5.

More votes against 123 yes · 201 no · 7 abst.

More votes against: 201 no and 123 yes, a margin of 78. 7 abstentions and 19 did not vote.

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's policy regarding the continuity of coal mining activity and the alternative development of mining comarcas.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

The chamber

Who voted how?

123 in favour, 201 against. 7 abstentions and 19 did not vote. 5 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto and GIP. Against, most of GC-CiU, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	101 in favour · 9 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 abst.
Mixto	18	14 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	16 against
GIP	11	8 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote
GUPyD	5	4 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso	185	178 against · 7 did not vote

Sources

Official wording of what was voted on: Punto 5.

Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 49
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.