Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Protects local councilors and cuts public funds to terrorism-linked parties

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 11 October 2002.

Official title: Private member's bill on the Organic Law for the guarantee of democracy in City Councils and the safety of Councillors.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000248· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. It punishes with six months to one year in prison those who seriously disrupt city council meetings, blocking access, the agenda or decisions, or causing disorder to support armed groups. It also increases penalties for those who slander, threaten or coerce local officials invoking terrorism.
  2. Regional and municipal police forces may act outside their territory to protect public officials, with authorization from the Ministry of the Interior or the regional government, and always in emergencies when requested by the authorities.
  3. Local governments may join court cases over crimes that hinder the work of local councilors, and judges must protect the confidentiality of public records on victims of threats or coercion.
  4. The State may pay for political parties' security expenses and distributes subsidies based on seats and votes. All public funding is cut off for parties whose conduct matches grounds for banning, or whose lists or leadership include people convicted of terrorism, rebellion or serious crimes against State institutions, unless they have publicly rejected such ends and means.
  5. It reforms the electoral law: people convicted of terrorism or rebellion are ineligible even if the sentence is not final, people under threat can be removed from voter list copies, election subsidies depend on elected officials actually taking office, and advances of up to 30 percent of the subsidy are regulated.
  6. The Senate must approve before the Government can dissolve local councils that support or justify terrorism or humiliate victims. Threatened councilors may file their declarations of interests with the provincial council or regional government in a special register.

Who it affects

  • Local councilors and members of local councils: They get criminal, police and data protection safeguards if threatened.
  • Political parties: They may receive security expense aid, but lose all public funding if they engage in bannable conduct or include terrorism convicts on their lists.
  • People who disrupt council meetings or threaten officials: They face prison terms and harsher penalties.
  • City councils and regional and municipal police: Their forces may act outside their territory to protect officials or in emergencies.
  • Voters and candidates: Rules on eligibility, voter lists and election subsidies change.

Words worth knowing

Pleno
Meeting of all the councilors of a city council to make decisions.
Inelegible
A person who cannot run as a candidate in an election.
Censo electoral
Official list of people entitled to vote in an election.
Comisión gestora
Temporary body that runs a city council when it cannot be normally constituted.
Personarse en la causa
To appear in a court case as a party, that is, as an injured party who sues or brings charges.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced11 October 2002Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 October 2002The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments7 November 2002Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee4 December 2002A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary11 December 2002All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate19 December 2002The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE27 February 2003It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2002Nov 2002Dec 2002Jan 200311. 11 October 2002: Presentación22. 15 October 2002: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 15/10/2002 hasta 18/10/200233. 15 October 2002: Calificación44. 18 October 2002: Gobierno Contestación desde 18/10/2002 hasta 29/10/200255. 29 October 2002: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 29/10/2002 hasta 05/11/200266. 5 November 2002: Comisión Constitucional Publicación desde 05/11/2002 hasta 07/11/200277. 7 November 2002: Comisión Constitucional Enmiendas desde 07/11/2002 hasta 04/12/200288. 4 December 2002: Comisión Constitucional Dictamen desde 04/12/2002 hasta 11/12/200299. 4 December 2002: Comisión Constitucional Informe desde 04/12/2002 hasta 04/12/20021010. 11 December 2002: Pleno Aprobación desde 11/12/2002 hasta 19/12/20021111. 19 December 2002: Senado desde 19/12/2002 hasta 27/02/20031212. 27 February 2003: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 27/02/2003 hasta 01/04/2003

Was there a plenary vote?

We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Organic Law 1/2003, of March 10, for the guarantee of democracy in City Councils and the safety of Councilors.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.