What it is
Bill would tighten prison grade progression for terrorism convicts
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 November 2025. Introduced by: Senado.
Official title: Private member's bill, Organic Law amending Organic Law 1/1979, of September 26, General Penitentiary Law, regarding the requirements for classification or grade progression for persons convicted of terrorism offenses.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 124/000040· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend Article 72.6 of the General Penitentiary Law. To be classified in or progress to the second or third grade, people convicted of terrorism would have to, in addition to paying civil liability, show clear signs of abandoning terrorism and cooperate with police and judicial authorities.
- It would replace the term "autoridades" (authorities) with "autoridades policiales y judiciales" (police and judicial authorities), so that those who investigate and try the crimes verify the inmate's cooperation. Cooperation could be proven through a statement renouncing their crimes, a request for forgiveness from victims, and technical reports showing real disengagement from the terrorist organization.
- It would add a section 7 to Article 72 to allow combining aspects of different grades in individualized treatment. For terrorism convicts, the same requirements as for grade progression would apply, and the measure would need prior approval from the prison surveillance judge.
- It would repeal Article 100.2 of the Penitentiary Regulations, which currently allows combining aspects of several grades without those requirements. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- People convicted of terrorism offenses: They would face stricter requirements to progress in grade or access models combining grades.
- Victims of terrorism: The bill gives them weight, since it requires a request for forgiveness and effective cooperation to clarify the crimes.
- Prison surveillance judges: They would have to authorize in advance the exceptional measure combining aspects of different grades.
- Prison administration: It would lose the ability to apply Article 100.2 of the Penitentiary Regulations and would be governed by the law.
Words worth knowing
- Progresión de grado (grade progression)
- Moving from a stricter prison regime to a less strict one, for example from first to second grade.
- Responsabilidad civil (civil liability)
- The obligation to financially compensate victims for the harm caused by the crime.
- Junta de Tratamiento (Treatment Board)
- The body in each prison that decides on inmates' treatment and classification.
- Juez de vigilancia penitenciaria (prison surveillance judge)
- The judge who oversees prison sentences and authorizes decisions about inmates.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced27 November 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted9 December 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments12 December 2025Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Was there a plenary vote?
We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 124/000040
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.