Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would let the judiciary council pick candidates for European courts

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 8 April 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, to regulate the procedure for designating candidates for judge and ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights and for judges and advocates general of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the European Union, which corresponds to the Kingdom of Spain to propose.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000273· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill argues that the Spanish government currently controls the selection of Spain's candidates for international courts, since most of the selection committee are senior officials appointed by the Council of Ministers. It says this does not meet the independence standards of the Council of Europe and the European Union.
  2. The bill would add a new paragraph to Article 560 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary. The General Council of the Judiciary would then designate candidates for judges and advocates general of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the EU, for the full judge and ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights, and for representatives before other international courts.
  3. The General Council of the Judiciary would have three months to approve a designation procedure based on transparency, publicity, merit and ability, following applicable European and international rules.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial): Would have to approve, within three months, a procedure for designating candidates for international courts, using transparency, merit and ability criteria.
  • The Government: Would lose its current control over the selection of Spain's candidates for these courts, which would move to the judiciary.
  • People who want to become judges or advocates general on European and international courts: Their candidacies would be selected by the judiciary council through a public, merit-based procedure.

Words worth knowing

Jueces ad hoc (ad hoc judges)
Judges appointed for a single case only, not permanently.
Terna
A shortlist of three candidates from which one is chosen.
Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
A special type of Spanish law, reserved for major matters, requiring a reinforced majority in Congress.
CGPJ
Consejo General del Poder Judicial, the body that governs judges in Spain.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced8 April 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted14 April 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Apr 2026May 202611. 8 April 2026: Presentación22. 14 April 2026: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 14/04/2026 hasta 17/04/202633. 14 April 2026: Calificación44. 17 April 2026: Gobierno Contestación desde 17/04/2026 hasta 27/05/202655. 27 May 2026: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 27/05/2026 hasta 16/06/202666. 16 June 2026: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 16/06/2026 hasta 22/06/2026

16 June 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 174 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to regulate the procedure for designating candidates for sitting judge and ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights and for judges and advocates general of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the European Union, which corresponds to the Kingdom of Spain to propose.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 186· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 10, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 30
  • Against: 10
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR26
25 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista121
120 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
5 against · 2 did not vote
Mixto8
2 in favour · 6 against
Popular en el Congreso137
135 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.