What it is
Bill would let the judiciary council pick candidates for European courts
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 8 April 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, to regulate the procedure for designating candidates for judge and ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights and for judges and advocates general of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the European Union, which corresponds to the Kingdom of Spain to propose.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000273· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill argues that the Spanish government currently controls the selection of Spain's candidates for international courts, since most of the selection committee are senior officials appointed by the Council of Ministers. It says this does not meet the independence standards of the Council of Europe and the European Union.
- The bill would add a new paragraph to Article 560 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary. The General Council of the Judiciary would then designate candidates for judges and advocates general of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the EU, for the full judge and ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights, and for representatives before other international courts.
- The General Council of the Judiciary would have three months to approve a designation procedure based on transparency, publicity, merit and ability, following applicable European and international rules.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial): Would have to approve, within three months, a procedure for designating candidates for international courts, using transparency, merit and ability criteria.
- The Government: Would lose its current control over the selection of Spain's candidates for these courts, which would move to the judiciary.
- People who want to become judges or advocates general on European and international courts: Their candidacies would be selected by the judiciary council through a public, merit-based procedure.
Words worth knowing
- Jueces ad hoc (ad hoc judges)
- Judges appointed for a single case only, not permanently.
- Terna
- A shortlist of three candidates from which one is chosen.
- Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
- A special type of Spanish law, reserved for major matters, requiring a reinforced majority in Congress.
- CGPJ
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial, the body that governs judges in Spain.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced8 April 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted14 April 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
16 June 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to regulate the procedure for designating candidates for sitting judge and ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights and for judges and advocates general of the Court of Justice and the General Court of the European Union, which corresponds to the Kingdom of Spain to propose.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 186· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 23 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 10
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 25 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 120 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 5 against · 2 did not vote |
| Mixto | 8 | 2 in favour · 6 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 135 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000273
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 186
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.