Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would make the CNMC Spain's digital services coordinator

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 March 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill on the legal enablement of the National Markets and Competition Commission as the coordinator of digital services in Spain.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000272· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would designate the National Markets and Competition Commission (Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia) as digital services coordinator, in charge of monitoring compliance with most of the obligations of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and the Spanish Data Protection Agency for the rules on advertising based on special categories of data or on profiling of minors.
  2. It would amend Law 34/2002 on information society services to align it with the EU Regulation: it repeals the articles that regulated the conditional exemption from liability of intermediary service providers and aligns orders against illegal content and information delivery orders with the Regulation.
  3. It would divide oversight duties: the Ministry for Digital Transformation would monitor obligations under Law 34/2002 and other regulations, the CNMC would monitor those under Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 with investigative powers such as requesting information, inspecting premises and interviewing staff, and the Spanish Data Protection Agency would monitor the obligations on advertising and minors.
  4. It would add a sanctioning regime for breaches of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, with fines of up to 6% of the provider's worldwide annual turnover for very serious infringements, and accessory sanctions such as publication of the sanctioning decision.
  5. It would introduce new features in the sanctioning procedure: termination if the offender adopts corrective measures, termination through binding commitments accepted by the CNMC, coercive fines of up to 5% of average daily worldwide turnover for failing to comply with measures, and limitation periods of one to three years depending on severity.
  6. It would amend Law 3/2013, which created the CNMC, to give it the functions of a digital services coordinator, such as forwarding enforcement orders to other coordinators, certifying out-of-court dispute resolution bodies, granting trusted flagger and authorized researcher status, and handling complaints. It would also create a Digital Services Directorate.

Who it affects

  • Intermediary service providers (online platforms, data hosting services, search engines): They would have to comply with the obligations of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 and could face fines of up to 6% of their worldwide annual turnover.
  • CNMC (National Markets and Competition Commission): It would become the digital services coordinator and competent authority, with investigative and sanctioning powers.
  • Spanish Data Protection Agency: It would monitor and sanction the obligations on advertising based on special categories of data and profiling of minors.
  • Users and consumers of digital services in Spain: They would benefit from a reinforced framework against illegal content, disinformation and risks such as cyber violence.
  • Ministry for Digital Transformation and Civil Service: It would keep oversight of the obligations under Law 34/2002 and other EU regulations.

Words worth knowing

Prestador de servicios intermediarios (intermediary service provider)
A company or person that provides online services to others, such as hosting data, running an online platform or a search engine.
Coordinador de servicios digitales (digital services coordinator)
The public authority each country must designate to monitor whether digital companies comply with the EU digital services regulation.
Diligencia debida (due diligence)
The set of care and control obligations digital companies must apply to prevent risks, such as illegal content or harm to minors.
Multas coercitivas (coercive fines)
Fines imposed for each day or period to force someone to comply with a measure that has already been ordered.
Prescripción (limitation period)
The time after which an infringement can no longer be punished.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 March 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted31 March 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2026Apr 2026Apr 2026Apr 2026Apr 202611. 27 March 2026: Presentación22. 31 March 2026: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 31/03/2026 hasta 07/04/202633. 31 March 2026: Calificación44. 31 March 2026: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por Mesa sin reunión desde 31/03/2026 hasta 31/03/202655. 7 April 2026: Gobierno Contestación desde 07/04/2026 hasta 07/04/202666. 7 April 2026: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/04/2026 hasta 14/04/202677. 14 April 2026: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/04/2026 hasta 20/04/2026

14 April 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 163 yes · 174 no · 8 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the legal authorization of the National Markets and Competition Commission as the coordinator of digital services in Spain.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 171· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 29, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 29
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR26
25 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 abst.
Socialista121
120 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
7 in favour · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
136 against · 1 did not vote
VOX33
31 against · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.