What it is
Bill would make the CNMC Spain's digital services coordinator
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 March 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill on the legal enablement of the National Markets and Competition Commission as the coordinator of digital services in Spain.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000272· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would designate the National Markets and Competition Commission (Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia) as digital services coordinator, in charge of monitoring compliance with most of the obligations of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and the Spanish Data Protection Agency for the rules on advertising based on special categories of data or on profiling of minors.
- It would amend Law 34/2002 on information society services to align it with the EU Regulation: it repeals the articles that regulated the conditional exemption from liability of intermediary service providers and aligns orders against illegal content and information delivery orders with the Regulation.
- It would divide oversight duties: the Ministry for Digital Transformation would monitor obligations under Law 34/2002 and other regulations, the CNMC would monitor those under Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 with investigative powers such as requesting information, inspecting premises and interviewing staff, and the Spanish Data Protection Agency would monitor the obligations on advertising and minors.
- It would add a sanctioning regime for breaches of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, with fines of up to 6% of the provider's worldwide annual turnover for very serious infringements, and accessory sanctions such as publication of the sanctioning decision.
- It would introduce new features in the sanctioning procedure: termination if the offender adopts corrective measures, termination through binding commitments accepted by the CNMC, coercive fines of up to 5% of average daily worldwide turnover for failing to comply with measures, and limitation periods of one to three years depending on severity.
- It would amend Law 3/2013, which created the CNMC, to give it the functions of a digital services coordinator, such as forwarding enforcement orders to other coordinators, certifying out-of-court dispute resolution bodies, granting trusted flagger and authorized researcher status, and handling complaints. It would also create a Digital Services Directorate.
Who it affects
- Intermediary service providers (online platforms, data hosting services, search engines): They would have to comply with the obligations of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 and could face fines of up to 6% of their worldwide annual turnover.
- CNMC (National Markets and Competition Commission): It would become the digital services coordinator and competent authority, with investigative and sanctioning powers.
- Spanish Data Protection Agency: It would monitor and sanction the obligations on advertising based on special categories of data and profiling of minors.
- Users and consumers of digital services in Spain: They would benefit from a reinforced framework against illegal content, disinformation and risks such as cyber violence.
- Ministry for Digital Transformation and Civil Service: It would keep oversight of the obligations under Law 34/2002 and other EU regulations.
Words worth knowing
- Prestador de servicios intermediarios (intermediary service provider)
- A company or person that provides online services to others, such as hosting data, running an online platform or a search engine.
- Coordinador de servicios digitales (digital services coordinator)
- The public authority each country must designate to monitor whether digital companies comply with the EU digital services regulation.
- Diligencia debida (due diligence)
- The set of care and control obligations digital companies must apply to prevent risks, such as illegal content or harm to minors.
- Multas coercitivas (coercive fines)
- Fines imposed for each day or period to force someone to comply with a measure that has already been ordered.
- Prescripción (limitation period)
- The time after which an infringement can no longer be punished.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced27 March 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted31 March 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
14 April 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the legal authorization of the National Markets and Competition Commission as the coordinator of digital services in Spain.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 171· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 18 yes · 10 no · 4 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 29, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 29
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 25 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 abst. |
| Socialista | 121 | 120 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 in favour · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 31 against · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000272
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 171
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.