Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would skip mandatory mediation in family cases with minors

Amendments step 3 of 7· Lapsed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 December 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Private member's bill for the reform of Organic Law 1/2025, of January 2, on measures regarding efficiency in the Public Justice Service; and for the amendment of Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, regarding family proceedings involving minors.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000247· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would remove the duty to first use an alternative dispute resolution method (such as mediation) in several cases: lawsuits for separation, divorce or measures concerning minor children, requests for precautionary or interim measures, voluntary jurisdiction proceedings, enforcement claims, exequatur of foreign documents, preliminary proceedings, and European payment or small claims procedures. The goal is to protect children's rights when child support, housing or contact with both parents is at stake.
  2. It would also provide that starting a negotiation through an alternative dispute resolution method counts, once the lawsuit is admitted, as the start of court proceedings. This prevents Spanish courts from losing jurisdiction to foreign courts and allows child support to be calculated from the start of the negotiation.
  3. In family verbal proceedings under Article 770 of the Civil Procedure Act, holding a hearing would always be mandatory, with the parties and their lawyers required to attend. If a party fails to appear without a valid excuse, the facts alleged by the other party may be deemed admitted.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Parents in family disputes involving minor children: They could go straight to court without first attempting mediation in the covered cases.
  • Minors caught in conflicts between their parents: The bill aims to protect their rights to child support, housing and contact with both parents sooner.
  • Family lawyers: They would have to attend the mandatory hearing in family cases under Article 770.
  • People negotiating agreements through mediation or similar methods: Starting that negotiation would count as starting the court case once the lawsuit is admitted.

Words worth knowing

Medio adecuado de solución de controversias (appropriate dispute resolution method)
A way to resolve a conflict without a trial, such as mediation or conciliation, where the parties negotiate and reach an agreement.
Requisito de procedibilidad (procedural prerequisite)
A condition that must be met before filing a lawsuit, in this case having first attempted mediation.
Exequátur
Judicial authorization for a foreign ruling or document to have legal effect in Spain.
Jurisdicción voluntaria (voluntary jurisdiction)
Court proceedings that are not a dispute between opposing parties, such as authorizing an act or intervening in a disagreement.
Litispendencia (lis pendens)
A situation where the same dispute is pending before two courts; the case filed later is dismissed or suspended.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced18 December 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 January 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments2 October 2026Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 18 December 2025: Presentación22. 15 January 2026: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 15/01/2026 hasta 19/01/202633. 15 January 2026: Calificación44. 19 January 2026: Gobierno Contestación desde 19/01/2026 hasta 09/03/202655. 9 March 2026: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 09/03/2026 hasta 22/09/202666. 22 September 2026: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 22/09/2026 hasta 29/09/202677. 29 September 2026: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 29/09/2026 hasta 02/10/202688. 2 October 2026: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 02/10/2026 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

22 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 340 yes · 7 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliamentary Group Vasco (EAJ-PNV), on the reform of Organic Law 1/2025, of January 2, on measures regarding efficiency in the Public Justice Service; and the amendment of Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, regarding family proceedings involving minors.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 199· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Republicano.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR26
26 in favour
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista121
121 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
6 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX32
32 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.