What it is
Bill would skip mandatory mediation in family cases with minors
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 December 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
Official title: Private member's bill for the reform of Organic Law 1/2025, of January 2, on measures regarding efficiency in the Public Justice Service; and for the amendment of Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, regarding family proceedings involving minors.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000247· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would remove the duty to first use an alternative dispute resolution method (such as mediation) in several cases: lawsuits for separation, divorce or measures concerning minor children, requests for precautionary or interim measures, voluntary jurisdiction proceedings, enforcement claims, exequatur of foreign documents, preliminary proceedings, and European payment or small claims procedures. The goal is to protect children's rights when child support, housing or contact with both parents is at stake.
- It would also provide that starting a negotiation through an alternative dispute resolution method counts, once the lawsuit is admitted, as the start of court proceedings. This prevents Spanish courts from losing jurisdiction to foreign courts and allows child support to be calculated from the start of the negotiation.
- In family verbal proceedings under Article 770 of the Civil Procedure Act, holding a hearing would always be mandatory, with the parties and their lawyers required to attend. If a party fails to appear without a valid excuse, the facts alleged by the other party may be deemed admitted.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Parents in family disputes involving minor children: They could go straight to court without first attempting mediation in the covered cases.
- Minors caught in conflicts between their parents: The bill aims to protect their rights to child support, housing and contact with both parents sooner.
- Family lawyers: They would have to attend the mandatory hearing in family cases under Article 770.
- People negotiating agreements through mediation or similar methods: Starting that negotiation would count as starting the court case once the lawsuit is admitted.
Words worth knowing
- Medio adecuado de solución de controversias (appropriate dispute resolution method)
- A way to resolve a conflict without a trial, such as mediation or conciliation, where the parties negotiate and reach an agreement.
- Requisito de procedibilidad (procedural prerequisite)
- A condition that must be met before filing a lawsuit, in this case having first attempted mediation.
- Exequátur
- Judicial authorization for a foreign ruling or document to have legal effect in Spain.
- Jurisdicción voluntaria (voluntary jurisdiction)
- Court proceedings that are not a dispute between opposing parties, such as authorizing an act or intervening in a disagreement.
- Litispendencia (lis pendens)
- A situation where the same dispute is pending before two courts; the case filed later is dismissed or suspended.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced18 December 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 January 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments2 October 2026Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
22 September 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliamentary Group Vasco (EAJ-PNV), on the reform of Organic Law 1/2025, of January 2, on measures regarding efficiency in the Public Justice Service; and the amendment of Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, regarding family proceedings involving minors.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 199· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 28 yes · 4 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 36 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 16 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Republicano.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 in favour |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 121 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 6 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 32 | 32 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000247
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 199
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.