Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would allow condo meetings by video call and digital minute book

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 14 November 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 49/1960, of July 21, on horizontal property.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000240· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow owners to attend homeowners' meetings by video call, if the meeting approves it or the building's bylaws include it. It amends Article 15 of the Horizontal Property Law.
  2. The bill proposes that the community's minute book can be kept in electronic format, following a model to be approved by the Directorate General for Legal Security and Public Faith. It amends Article 19.
  3. Owners could give the community's secretary their address in Spain or an email address to receive summonses and notices. If they do not, the apartment or premises will count as the address, and if a notice cannot be delivered it will be posted on the community notice board and take effect after three calendar days. It amends Article 9.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Owners of apartments and premises in homeowners' communities: Could attend meetings by video call and designate an email address for notices.
  • Administrators and secretaries of homeowners' communities: Could use a digital minute book and must manage the new ways of attending meetings and receiving notices.
  • Property Registrars: Would certify the minute book under the new electronic model.

Words worth knowing

Comunidad de propietarios
Group of owners of apartments and premises in a building who share common areas and make decisions together.
Junta de propietarios
Meeting where the owners of a building vote and make decisions.
Libro de actas diligenciado
Official book where the community's decisions are recorded, previously certified by a registrar.
Nudo propietario
Owner of a home who does not have the right to use it because that right belongs to someone else (the usufructuary).
Usufructuario
Person who may use a home and take its income even though they do not own it.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced14 November 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted18 November 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments12 June 2026Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 14 November 2025: Presentación22. 18 November 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 18/11/2025 hasta 21/11/202533. 18 November 2025: Calificación44. 21 November 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 21/11/2025 hasta 03/02/202655. 3 February 2026: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 03/02/2026 hasta 26/05/202666. 26 May 2026: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 26/05/2026 hasta 08/06/202677. 8 June 2026: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 08/06/2026 hasta 12/06/202688. 12 June 2026: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 12/06/2026 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

26 May 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 306 yes · 33 no · 10 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to amend Law 49/1960, of 21 July, on horizontal property.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 181· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Plurinacional SUMAR and Junts per Catalunya. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 51
  • Against: 0
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 abst.
Plurinacional SUMAR26
1 in favour · 25 against
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista121
120 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
3 in favour · 1 against · 4 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
137 in favour
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.