What it is
Bill would allow condo meetings by video call and digital minute book
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 14 November 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 49/1960, of July 21, on horizontal property.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000240· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow owners to attend homeowners' meetings by video call, if the meeting approves it or the building's bylaws include it. It amends Article 15 of the Horizontal Property Law.
- The bill proposes that the community's minute book can be kept in electronic format, following a model to be approved by the Directorate General for Legal Security and Public Faith. It amends Article 19.
- Owners could give the community's secretary their address in Spain or an email address to receive summonses and notices. If they do not, the apartment or premises will count as the address, and if a notice cannot be delivered it will be posted on the community notice board and take effect after three calendar days. It amends Article 9.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Owners of apartments and premises in homeowners' communities: Could attend meetings by video call and designate an email address for notices.
- Administrators and secretaries of homeowners' communities: Could use a digital minute book and must manage the new ways of attending meetings and receiving notices.
- Property Registrars: Would certify the minute book under the new electronic model.
Words worth knowing
- Comunidad de propietarios
- Group of owners of apartments and premises in a building who share common areas and make decisions together.
- Junta de propietarios
- Meeting where the owners of a building vote and make decisions.
- Libro de actas diligenciado
- Official book where the community's decisions are recorded, previously certified by a registrar.
- Nudo propietario
- Owner of a home who does not have the right to use it because that right belongs to someone else (the usufructuary).
- Usufructuario
- Person who may use a home and take its income even though they do not own it.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced14 November 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted18 November 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments12 June 2026Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
26 May 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to amend Law 49/1960, of 21 July, on horizontal property.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 181· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 11 yes · 1 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 25 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 31 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 10 yes · 1 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 13 yes · 3 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Plurinacional SUMAR and Junts per Catalunya. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 51
- Against: 0
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 1 in favour · 25 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 121 | 120 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 3 in favour · 1 against · 4 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XV Legislature, Senate Private member's bill to amend Law 49/1960, of July 21, on horizontal property.
Presented before in:
- VI Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn· nearly the same title Private member's bill on the amendment of Law 49/1960, of July 21, on Horizontal Property.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000240
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 181
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.