Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Rules for advertising and booking tourist apartments on platforms

Committee step 4 of 7· Lapsed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 July 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Euskal Herria Bildu.

Official title: Private member's bill on the control and regulation of advertising and contracting of tourist apartments.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000214· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require platforms and websites that list tourist apartments to check that each home has a valid license or registration number, and that the person listing it matches the license holder. Without that check, listing and booking are banned.
  2. Listings would have to visibly show the license or registration number, how many homes the host manages, and whether the host is an individual or a company. Contracts would have to include the price with a breakdown, a description of the home, the length of stay and other details.
  3. Verification would be done by checking public registers such as the Registro Único de Arrendamientos or the Ventanilla Única Digital de Arrendamientos, or by requesting the license from the competent authority.
  4. The bill proposes a penalty system with fines from €10,000 to €1,000,000 depending on severity. Allowing bookings of unlicensed homes would be a very serious offense; publishing incomplete or false listings, a serious one; omitting secondary details, a minor one. Fines can add up for each violation.
  5. Service provider companies would bear main responsibility for what they publish and the bookings they handle. If they repeat violations knowingly or as a habit, the administration could temporarily or permanently suspend their advertising and booking channels.
  6. A specialized inspection unit would be created within three months to periodically review platforms and issue reports on non-compliant listings. Listings already published would have to be adapted within fifteen days of the law taking effect.

Who it affects

  • Digital platforms, websites and portals listing tourist apartments: They would have to verify licenses and data before publishing or allowing bookings, and face fines if they do not.
  • Hosts renting out tourist homes: They would have to provide identification, the number of homes they manage, and sign a commitment to the accuracy of their data.
  • Guests booking these accommodations: They would get more detailed contracts and the assurance that the home is registered.
  • Municipalities and autonomous communities: They keep their powers over licenses and registers, and would receive reports from the inspection unit.

Words worth knowing

Vivienda de Uso Turístico (VUT)
A home or accommodation rented for short stays for tourism purposes.
Registro Único de Arrendamientos
A register where these short-term rentals are recorded and assigned their registration number.
Ventanilla Única Digital de Arrendamientos
A national digital gateway for platforms to share data on these rentals with the authorities.
Empresa prestadora de servicios
Any company, digital or not, that allows these accommodations to be listed and booked: platforms, websites, portals or apps.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced18 July 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted22 July 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 October 2025Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee26 February 2026A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 18 July 2025: Presentación22. 22 July 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 22/07/2025 hasta 24/07/202533. 22 July 2025: Calificación44. 24 July 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 24/07/2025 hasta 24/09/202555. 24 September 2025: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 24/09/2025 hasta 07/10/202566. 7 October 2025: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 07/10/2025 hasta 14/10/202577. 14 October 2025: Comisión de Vivienda y Agenda Urbana Publicación desde 14/10/2025 hasta 17/10/202588. 17 October 2025: Comisión de Vivienda y Agenda Urbana Enmiendas desde 17/10/2025 hasta 26/02/202699. 26 February 2026: Comisión de Vivienda y Agenda Urbana Informe desde 26/02/2026 hasta 06/10/20261010. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

11 December 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 336 yes · 11 no

Voted on: Vote on the request by the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Private Member's Bill on the control and regulation of advertising and contracting of tourist apartments, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 28 of sitting 154· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu and Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

By province: in 49 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 49
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR26
26 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX33
32 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.