What it is
Rules for advertising and booking tourist apartments on platforms
Committee step 4 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 July 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Euskal Herria Bildu.
Official title: Private member's bill on the control and regulation of advertising and contracting of tourist apartments.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000214· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require platforms and websites that list tourist apartments to check that each home has a valid license or registration number, and that the person listing it matches the license holder. Without that check, listing and booking are banned.
- Listings would have to visibly show the license or registration number, how many homes the host manages, and whether the host is an individual or a company. Contracts would have to include the price with a breakdown, a description of the home, the length of stay and other details.
- Verification would be done by checking public registers such as the Registro Único de Arrendamientos or the Ventanilla Única Digital de Arrendamientos, or by requesting the license from the competent authority.
- The bill proposes a penalty system with fines from €10,000 to €1,000,000 depending on severity. Allowing bookings of unlicensed homes would be a very serious offense; publishing incomplete or false listings, a serious one; omitting secondary details, a minor one. Fines can add up for each violation.
- Service provider companies would bear main responsibility for what they publish and the bookings they handle. If they repeat violations knowingly or as a habit, the administration could temporarily or permanently suspend their advertising and booking channels.
- A specialized inspection unit would be created within three months to periodically review platforms and issue reports on non-compliant listings. Listings already published would have to be adapted within fifteen days of the law taking effect.
Who it affects
- Digital platforms, websites and portals listing tourist apartments: They would have to verify licenses and data before publishing or allowing bookings, and face fines if they do not.
- Hosts renting out tourist homes: They would have to provide identification, the number of homes they manage, and sign a commitment to the accuracy of their data.
- Guests booking these accommodations: They would get more detailed contracts and the assurance that the home is registered.
- Municipalities and autonomous communities: They keep their powers over licenses and registers, and would receive reports from the inspection unit.
Words worth knowing
- Vivienda de Uso Turístico (VUT)
- A home or accommodation rented for short stays for tourism purposes.
- Registro Único de Arrendamientos
- A register where these short-term rentals are recorded and assigned their registration number.
- Ventanilla Única Digital de Arrendamientos
- A national digital gateway for platforms to share data on these rentals with the authorities.
- Empresa prestadora de servicios
- Any company, digital or not, that allows these accommodations to be listed and booked: platforms, websites, portals or apps.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced18 July 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted22 July 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments17 October 2025Groups propose changes.
- Committee26 February 2026A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
11 December 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the request by the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Private Member's Bill on the control and regulation of advertising and contracting of tourist apartments, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 28 of sitting 154· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 32 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 36 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu and Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
By province: in 49 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 49
- Against: 1
- Tie: 2
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 in favour |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000214
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 28 of sitting 154
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.