What it is
Bill proposes cutting the workweek to 35 hours
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 12 February 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill to reduce the maximum duration of the ordinary working day to 35 hours per week.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000159· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would reduce the maximum workweek to 35 hours of effective work, instead of the current 40 hours.
- The break of at least 15 minutes on workdays longer than six hours would count as effective working time.
- The right to disconnect digitally would be strengthened: workers would not have to answer work messages or calls outside working hours, and exceptional on-call time would be compensated with time off.
- Work time would be recorded daily through digital means, with exact start and end times, no later tampering allowed, and companies would have to keep the records for four years.
- The shorter workweek could not reduce pay or remove more favorable rights and conditions workers already have.
- Collective agreements with workweeks above 35 hours would have six months to adapt, and companies would have three months to adapt their time-recording systems.
Who it affects
- Employees: Their maximum workweek would be capped at 35 hours, with new rights to disconnect and to have their hours recorded.
- Part-time workers: Their hours would range from 20 to 77 percent of the maximum, with continuous schedules and stricter rules on extra hours.
- Companies: They would have to adapt work hours, digital time records, and the rules on irregular schedules and part-time contracts.
- Public sector: Part-time contracts would be exceptional, justified, and limited in time.
- Collective agreements: They would have six months to adjust their workweeks to 35 hours.
Words worth knowing
- Convenio colectivo (collective agreement)
- A deal between unions and employers setting working conditions for a sector or company.
- Horas complementarias (complementary hours)
- Extra hours that can be agreed in some part-time contracts.
- Distribución irregular de la jornada (irregular distribution of working hours)
- Spreading work hours unevenly across the year, with more hours some days and fewer others.
- ET (Estatuto de los Trabajadores, Workers' Statute)
- Spain's main law on labor rights and duties.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced12 February 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted18 February 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
14 October 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Mixed Parliamentary Group, to reduce the maximum duration of the ordinary working day to 35 hours per week.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 137· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 10 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 14 yes · 21 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 31, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 10
- Against: 31
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 25 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 6 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 against |
| VOX | 33 | 33 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000159
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 13 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 137
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.