What it is
Bill to speed up evictions of illegally occupied properties
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 21 January 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Junts per Catalunya.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law of urgent measures to address the illegal occupation of real estate.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000150· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow police to immediately evict a property in cases of home invasion, usurpation and violation of domicile when these are flagrant offenses, considering that entry may have happened within the previous 48 hours if there are signs such as broken doors or alarm alerts.
- It would create an urgent precautionary eviction measure: after a complaint is filed, a judge could order the removal of anyone in the property and return it to the owner. Occupants would have 48 hours to prove legitimate possession, and social services would be notified so they can rehouse vulnerable people.
- It would allow the minor offense of usurpation of real estate to be tried through the expedited procedure, summoning the parties immediately to the duty court.
- It would limit suspension of evictions for vulnerable people to those occupying homes owned by large landlords (more than ten homes), until December 31, 2025, and would set cases where suspension is never allowed, such as the owner's usual home, entries involving violence, or social housing already assigned.
- It would remove jury trial jurisdiction over the offense of home invasion (allanamiento de morada).
- In civil proceedings, it would make it easier for owners and legitimate possessors to immediately recover properties occupied without title, remove prior requirements that delayed lawsuits, and eliminate the economic vulnerability procedure that could be used to drag out cases.
Who it affects
- Owners and legitimate possessors of occupied properties: They could recover possession much faster, even within 48 hours.
- People occupying properties without title: They would face faster evictions with fewer ways to delay them by claiming vulnerability.
- People in vulnerable situations: Social services would be notified so they can be rehoused before eviction.
- Large landlords owning more than ten homes: Only their evictions could be suspended for vulnerability, and only until December 31, 2025.
Words worth knowing
- Medida cautelar
- A provisional court decision to protect a right while the case is being resolved.
- Delito flagrante
- A flagrant offense: one being committed or just committed when the person is caught in the act.
- Lanzamiento
- A court-ordered eviction from a property, with police assistance if needed.
- Juicio inmediato por delito leve
- A fast criminal procedure for minor offenses, held at the duty court.
- Gran tenedor
- A natural or legal person owning more than ten homes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced21 January 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted29 January 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments1 April 2025Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
18 March 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Junts per Catalunya Parliamentary Group, on urgent measures to address illegal occupation of properties (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 99· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 11 yes · 1 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 23 yes · 9 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 29 yes · 5 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 10 yes · 1 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 9 yes · 1 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 13 yes · 3 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 26 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 3 in favour · 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 135 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Presented before in:
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to quickly evict people who illegally occupy properties
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000150
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 13 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 99
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.