Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to require specialized judges in gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman. courts

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 January 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law to guarantee the functioning of the sections of the Courts of First Instance and the Provincial Courts in matters of violence against women, as well as the specialization of the judges and magistrates assigned to them.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000149· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would provide that seats in the violence against women sections of the trial courts be considered criminal in nature and filled by judges who prove specialization through tests set by the General Council of the Judiciary. If none are available, priority would go to those with the most service in these bodies in the previous five years.
  2. It would also provide that magistrate seats in the provincial court sections specialized in violence against women be filled by those who prove specialization, or failing that, by those with the most service in these bodies in the previous ten years.
  3. It would remove the rule that gave these courts the investigation of the crime of breaching a sentence when the victim is the suspect's wife or partner, and would delete the corresponding provision in the Criminal Procedure Act.
  4. The General Council of the Judiciary would have to approve the rules for the specialization tests within three months, and the Government would have to increase the number of violence against women sections, with more resources, funding and specialized judge positions.
  5. The Council would periodically hold a specialized course on the forms of violence against women, and the Government would promote similar training courses for public prosecutors.
  6. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, except measures with budget costs, which would wait until the following fiscal year. The second article and the second additional provision would have the rank of ordinary law.

Who it affects

  • Judges and magistrates seeking gender violence posts: They would need to prove specialization through tests or have prior experience in the field to get these seats.
  • Women victims of gender violence: They would be served by more specialized court sections with more resources.
  • General Council of the Judiciary: It would have to develop the specialization tests and training courses within three months.
  • Government: It would have to add sections, resources and judge positions, and fund the organizational changes, including for regional governments with justice powers.

Words worth knowing

Tribunales de instancia (trial courts)
New courts that the judicial efficiency law plans to create to replace the current first instance and criminal courts.
Audiencias provinciales (provincial courts)
Courts that review rulings issued by the trial courts of each province.
Consejo General del Poder Judicial
The body that governs the courts and organizes the competitions to fill judge positions.
Quebrantamiento de condena (breach of sentence)
The crime committed by someone who fails to comply with a sentence, a precautionary measure or a security measure imposed by a court.
Ley orgánica (organic law)
A type of law reserved for major matters, such as the organization of the judiciary, which requires enhanced majorities to pass.
gender violence
Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced15 January 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted29 January 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2025Feb 202511. 15 January 2025: Presentación22. 29 January 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 29/01/2025 hasta 31/01/202533. 29 January 2025: Calificación44. 29 January 2025: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por Mesa sin reunión desde 29/01/2025 hasta 29/01/202555. 31 January 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 31/01/2025 hasta 08/03/202566. 8 March 2025: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/03/2025 hasta 25/03/202577. 25 March 2025: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 25/03/2025 hasta 31/03/2025

25 March 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 149 yes · 196 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic Law to guarantee the functioning of the sections of the Courts of First Instance and the Provincial Courts in matters of violence against women, as well as the specialization of judges and magistrates assigned to them.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 102· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 12
  • Against: 30
  • Tie: 10
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
25 against · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto8
1 in favour · 7 against
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX33
32 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.