What it is
Bill to require specialized judges in gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman. courts
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 January 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law to guarantee the functioning of the sections of the Courts of First Instance and the Provincial Courts in matters of violence against women, as well as the specialization of the judges and magistrates assigned to them.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000149· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would provide that seats in the violence against women sections of the trial courts be considered criminal in nature and filled by judges who prove specialization through tests set by the General Council of the Judiciary. If none are available, priority would go to those with the most service in these bodies in the previous five years.
- It would also provide that magistrate seats in the provincial court sections specialized in violence against women be filled by those who prove specialization, or failing that, by those with the most service in these bodies in the previous ten years.
- It would remove the rule that gave these courts the investigation of the crime of breaching a sentence when the victim is the suspect's wife or partner, and would delete the corresponding provision in the Criminal Procedure Act.
- The General Council of the Judiciary would have to approve the rules for the specialization tests within three months, and the Government would have to increase the number of violence against women sections, with more resources, funding and specialized judge positions.
- The Council would periodically hold a specialized course on the forms of violence against women, and the Government would promote similar training courses for public prosecutors.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, except measures with budget costs, which would wait until the following fiscal year. The second article and the second additional provision would have the rank of ordinary law.
Who it affects
- Judges and magistrates seeking gender violence posts: They would need to prove specialization through tests or have prior experience in the field to get these seats.
- Women victims of gender violence: They would be served by more specialized court sections with more resources.
- General Council of the Judiciary: It would have to develop the specialization tests and training courses within three months.
- Government: It would have to add sections, resources and judge positions, and fund the organizational changes, including for regional governments with justice powers.
Words worth knowing
- Tribunales de instancia (trial courts)
- New courts that the judicial efficiency law plans to create to replace the current first instance and criminal courts.
- Audiencias provinciales (provincial courts)
- Courts that review rulings issued by the trial courts of each province.
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial
- The body that governs the courts and organizes the competitions to fill judge positions.
- Quebrantamiento de condena (breach of sentence)
- The crime committed by someone who fails to comply with a sentence, a precautionary measure or a security measure imposed by a court.
- Ley orgánica (organic law)
- A type of law reserved for major matters, such as the organization of the judiciary, which requires enhanced majorities to pass.
- gender violence
- Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced15 January 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted29 January 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
25 March 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic Law to guarantee the functioning of the sections of the Courts of First Instance and the Provincial Courts in matters of violence against women, as well as the specialization of judges and magistrates assigned to them.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 102· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 8 yes · 23 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Girona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 18 no
- Málaga More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 10 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 30, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 12
- Against: 30
- Tie: 10
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 25 against · 2 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 1 in favour · 7 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 against · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000149
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 102
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.