What it is
Bill to improve protection for workers in alternative mutual societies
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 21 November 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Royal Legislative Decree 8/2015, of October 30, approving the consolidated text of the General Social Security Law in relation to the alternative mutualities regulated in its additional provisions 18 and 19.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000143· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would raise the minimum benefits paid by mutual societies that act as an alternative to the Special Scheme for Self-Employed Workers: periodic payments could not be lower than 100% of the minimum public pension (or the non-contributory pension if higher), and a lump sum could not be lower than the capitalized equivalent of that minimum.
- The mutual society would be considered to meet that minimum if the member's contributions equal 100% of the contribution resulting from applying the general common-contingency rate of the self-employed scheme to the member's minimum base. The increase would be gradual: 86% in 2026, 93% in 2027 and 100% in 2028.
- It would create a gateway so that professionals who are members of an alternative mutual society could request, within one year of the implementing regulation, the voluntary transfer of their accumulated economic rights to Social Security. They must lack the minimum period for a retirement pension and not be a pensioner (except for a widow's pension), and moving to the self-employed scheme would be mandatory and irreversible.
- The transfer would have no personal income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. (IRPF) consequences when carried out, and to convert it into contribution periods the minimum base the worker would have had would be used, updated and with an improvement coefficient of 0.77. Members who turned 52 by December 31, 2026 would count each month in the mutual society as a month in the self-employed scheme.
- Transparency would be strengthened: alternative mutual societies would have to give their members a clear semiannual report on their funds and how they evolve, and send documentation to the Directorate General of Insurance and Pension Funds for supervision. The Government would also have to approve, within one year, regulatory reforms with more transparency, supervision and control guarantees.
- The Government would have to evaluate the alternative regime before December 31, 2027 and send the report to the Cortes Generales. A special agreement is also planned for those who left their mutual society before it applied individual capitalization and do not reach fifteen years of contributions, allowing them to count up to five years before leaving.
Who it affects
- Self-employed professionals who belong to a mutual society that is an alternative to the self-employed scheme.: Their benefits would have a higher minimum and they could voluntarily and irreversibly transfer their rights to Social Security.
- Members paying contributions to the mutual society.: The minimum-equivalent contribution would rise gradually to 100% in 2028.
- Those who left an alternative mutual society before individual capitalization and do not reach fifteen years of contributions.: They could sign a special agreement to count up to five years of contributions before leaving.
- The alternative mutual societies themselves.: They would have to give more information to their members and to the Directorate General of Insurance and Pension Funds.
Words worth knowing
- Mutualidad de previsión social alternativa (alternative mutual society)
- A nonprofit insurance entity that, as an exception, replaces the public self-employed scheme for some professional association members.
- Profesional colegiado (professional association member)
- Someone who practices a profession requiring registration with a professional association, such as lawyers or doctors.
- Capitalización individual (individual capitalization)
- A system where each person's contributions accumulate in their own account and benefits are paid from it.
- Convenio especial (special agreement)
- An agreement with Social Security to pay contributions so they count as contribution periods.
- Base reguladora (regulatory base)
- The amount calculated from contribution bases used to set the pension amount.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the text passed by the committee. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced21 November 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted26 November 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments16 May 2025Groups propose changes.
- Committee10 June 2025A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary26 May 2026All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate11 June 2026The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE23 July 2026It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 16 official steps on a timeline
23 July 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Remaining amendments.
This law had 28 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 17 of sitting 193· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 32 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 36 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 16 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 25 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 121 | 121 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 32 | 32 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000143
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 13 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 17 of sitting 193
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.