Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would reform Spain's citizen security law with more safeguards

Committee step 4 of 7· Lapsed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 October 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR Grupo Parlamentario Euskal Herria Bildu Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Private member's Organic Law on the protection of freedoms and citizen security.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000131· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would rename the law and give it a more rights-based approach: security should serve so that rights and freedoms can be freely exercised, and any restriction must be legal and proportionate.
  2. It would improve safeguards in police identifications and searches: identification must be based on reasonable suspicion, without discrimination based on language or gender, and transfers to police stations would be limited to 2 hours, extendable only with justified reasons up to 6. It would also allow entering a home during disasters to rescue animals.
  3. It would strengthen the right of assembly and demonstration: lack of prior notice alone would not be enough to stop a demonstration, police dissolution would become a last resort with prior warning, and organizers would be exempt from liability if they meet the requirements.
  4. It would reform the sanctions system: several offenses would be removed (such as demonstrations in front of the Congress or the Senate), drug possession would drop from serious to minor, photographing police operations would no longer be punishable, and fines would be reduced based on income (up to 50% for low incomes).
  5. It would lower fine amounts: minor offenses would carry fines of €100 to €500 and serious ones €501 to €25,000, and sanctions could be suspended through educational or restorative activities.
  6. It would add new provisions: mediation training for police, annual transparency statistics, protocols on the use of force and riot gear with a gradual replacement of rubber bullets, and a review of the special regime for Ceuta and Melilla within 6 months.

Who it affects

  • The general public: More limits and controls on police identifications, searches and sanctions.
  • Organizers and participants in demonstrations: More protection of the right of assembly and less liability for third-party acts.
  • Sanctioned people with low incomes: Fine reductions of between 25% and 50% based on their financial capacity.
  • Police and state security forces: New duties of justification, mediation and operating protocols.
  • Migrants in Ceuta and Melilla: Review of the special regime of the immigration law within 6 months.

Words worth knowing

Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by parliamentary groups so it can become law. It is not approved yet.
Ley orgánica
Organic law: a type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights, requiring special majorities to pass.
Principio de proporcionalidad
Proportionality principle: measures and sanctions must match the seriousness of the act, without going too far.
Infracción leve, grave y muy grave
Categories of administrative offenses ordered from least to most serious, with different fines.
Balas de goma
Rubber bullets: kinetic projectiles used by police in riots; the bill proposes replacing them with less harmful means.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced4 October 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted8 October 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments15 November 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee10 December 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 4 October 2024: Presentación22. 8 October 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 08/10/2024 hasta 11/10/202433. 8 October 2024: Calificación44. 11 October 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 11/10/2024 hasta 17/10/202455. 17 October 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/10/2024 hasta 29/10/202466. 29 October 2024: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 29/10/2024 hasta 12/11/202477. 12 November 2024: Comisión de Interior Publicación desde 12/11/2024 hasta 15/11/202488. 15 November 2024: Comisión de Interior Enmiendas desde 15/11/2024 hasta 19/12/202499. 28 November 2024: Comisión de Interior Mesa - Calificación desde 28/11/2024 hasta 10/12/20241010. 10 December 2024: Comisión de Interior Debate de totalidad desde 10/12/2024 hasta 12/12/20241111. 19 December 2024: Comisión de Interior Informe desde 19/12/2024 hasta 06/10/20261212. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

12 December 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 33 yes · 176 no · 137 abst.

Voted on: Amendment to the whole of alternative text submitted by the VOX Parliamentary Group.

This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 85· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 15, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 15
  • Abstained: 16
  • Tie: 21
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
6 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
136 abst. · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.