What it is
Bill would require power and gas firms to disclose dispute channels
Committee step 4 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 3 October 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 24/2013, of December 26, of the Electric Sector and Law 34/1998, of October 7, of the hydrocarbons sector to harmonize the information to be included in the web pages, contracts and invoices of electricity and gas in relation to the alternative resolution of disputes in consumer matters.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000130· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require electricity suppliers to include on their websites, contracts and bills the name and contact details of at least one alternative dispute resolution entity, and to make its decision binding on both the company and the consumer.
- The bill would require natural gas suppliers to do the same: offer an alternative dispute resolution entity and publish its details on websites, contracts and bills, with a binding decision.
- If passed, the law would take effect three months after publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
- The sponsors argue that most people do not know these complaint channels exist, and that oversight reports by the National Markets and Competition Commission call for aligning this information with Law 7/2017.
Who it affects
- Electricity consumers: Would see on supplier websites, contracts and bills how to use an alternative dispute resolution entity, with a binding decision.
- Natural gas consumers: Would have the same right to information and access to an alternative dispute resolution entity.
- Electricity and gas suppliers: Would have to include these details on websites, contracts and bills and accept binding decisions.
Words worth knowing
- Resolución alternativa de litigios (ADR)
- Alternative dispute resolution: settling conflicts without going to court, through an entity that mediates or decides between the company and the consumer.
- Vinculante
- Binding: the decision must be followed by both parties.
- Comercializadora
- Supplier: a company that sells electricity or natural gas to consumers.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced3 October 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 October 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments29 November 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committee27 March 2025A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
10 April 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the request for the Chamber Plenary to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Private member's bill to amend Law 24/2013, of December 26, of the Electric Sector and Law 34/1998, of October 7, of the hydrocarbons sector, to harmonize the information to be included in websites, contracts, and invoices for electricity and gas regarding alternative dispute resolution in consumer matters, presented by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 21 of sitting 106· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 32 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 37 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 27 in favour |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000130
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 21 of sitting 106
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.