Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to protect borrowers from abusive mortgage amortization clauses

Amendments step 3 of 7· Lapsed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 July 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.

Official title: Private member's bill on the regulation of Redito Ad Libitum clauses in the contracting of mortgage loans and credits.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000124· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create new ways to end mortgage contracts with abusive amortization clauses, such as formulas with errors or that make it impossible to calculate payments, and would set out how to fix those contracts.
  2. It defines which clauses are covered: the so-called REDAL clauses, those that fail to disclose payments under different interest rate scenarios, undefined financial jargon, and the interest formula errors listed in two annexes.
  3. Lenders would have to set up a voluntary claim system for consumers and offer a mixed payment system covering interest and amortizing capital. They could not start civil proceedings for nonpayment if the payments made exceed the monthly interest.
  4. If the bank rejects the claim, the consumer could appeal to the Bank of Spain (Banco de España), which would rule within two months with a binding opinion. If the bank does not respond within three months, the consumer's request would be deemed accepted.
  5. Keeping these clauses after a resolved claim would be a consumer offense, and filing the request would automatically suspend lawsuits arising from that contract.

Who it affects

  • People with mortgages containing abusive or unclear amortization clauses, such as increasing payment loans: They could claim to replace those clauses and choose the most favorable option
  • Lenders: They would have to set up claim systems, offer mixed payments, and face penalties for keeping abusive clauses
  • Bank of Spain (Banco de España): It would resolve disputes with binding opinions and could add new bias mechanisms to the list
  • Ministries of Economy and Consumer Affairs: They would update the error tables and oversee proper application of the rule

Words worth knowing

Amortización (amortization)
Paying back part of the borrowed money, on top of interest, with each payment
Subamortización (under-amortization)
Paying off less principal than under the French system, leaving a larger debt
Sistema francés (French system)
The usual method for calculating mortgages with equal payments
Cláusula REDAL (Redito ad Libitum)
The bill's name for amortization clauses with errors or missing information
Dictamen vinculante (binding opinion)
A Bank of Spain ruling that both parties must follow

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced16 July 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted23 July 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments31 October 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 16 July 2024: Presentación22. 23 July 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 23/07/2024 hasta 26/07/202433. 23 July 2024: Calificación44. 26 July 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 26/07/2024 hasta 07/10/202455. 7 October 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/10/2024 hasta 22/10/202466. 22 October 2024: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 22/10/2024 hasta 29/10/202477. 29 October 2024: Comisión de Derechos Sociales y Consumo Publicación desde 29/10/2024 hasta 31/10/202488. 31 October 2024: Comisión de Derechos Sociales y Consumo Enmiendas desde 31/10/2024 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

11 December 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 337 yes · 11 no

Voted on: Vote on the request by the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Private Member's Bill relating to the regulation of Redito Ad Libitum clauses in the contracting of loans and mortgage credits, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 27 of sitting 154· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu and Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

By province: in 49 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 49
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR26
26 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
137 in favour
VOX33
32 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.