Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to limit seasonal rentals and room rentals

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 June 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.

Official title: Private member's bill on the regulation of seasonal housing rental contracts and room rentals.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000119· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would amend the Urban Leases Law so that seasonal contracts and room rentals give tenants more protection, because they are used to avoid long contracts and rent increase limits.
  2. The bill would require landlords to state the reason for the temporary nature in the contract and verify it. If they do not, the contract is presumed to be for a regular home.
  3. It would cap temporary rentals at six months. If they last longer or more than two contracts are chained together, they would be treated as regular home rentals, with their minimum terms and extensions.
  4. It would also set rules for temporary contracts: the tenant could end the contract after one month with ten days notice and no penalty, the landlord must keep the home habitable and make repairs within five business days, and extra guarantees would be capped at half a month's rent.

Who it affects

  • Landlords of seasonal homes: They would have to justify the temporary nature in writing and handle repairs within five business days.
  • Tenants of seasonal or room rentals: They would get more protection: if the temporary contract is not properly justified, it counts as a regular home rental, and they could leave after one month with no penalty.
  • Tenants who want to assign or sublet: They could assign or sublet with fewer requirements in temporary contracts, and the sublet could not cost more than the rent.

Words worth knowing

Arrendamiento
Rental contract: one person pays to use a home or premises owned by another.
Desistimiento
The tenant's decision to end the contract early.
Fianza
Security deposit paid in case the tenant fails to meet their obligations.
Días hábiles
Business days, not counting holidays or weekends.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 June 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 July 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2024Jul 2024Aug 202411. 27 June 2024: Presentación22. 2 July 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/07/2024 hasta 05/07/202433. 2 July 2024: Calificación44. 5 July 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 05/07/2024 hasta 09/09/202455. 9 September 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 09/09/2024 hasta 17/09/202466. 17 September 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 17/09/2024 hasta 23/09/2024

17 September 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 172 yes · 178 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plurinacional SUMAR Parliamentary Group, regarding the regulation of seasonal housing rental contracts and room rentals.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 59· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 30
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
7 in favour · 1 against
Popular en el Congreso137
137 against
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.