What it is
Bill to punish pimping and those who pay for sex
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 19 March 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, on the Penal Code, to prohibit pimping in all its forms.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000077· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend the Criminal Code to punish pimping in general terms, without requiring exploitation of the prostituted person. According to its authors, that current requirement has led to practical impunity for this conduct.
- Anyone who, for profit, promotes, favors or facilitates the prostitution of another person, even with that person's consent, would face two to four years in prison and a fine. Penalties would be harsher in cases involving violence, deception, abuse of a situation of need, criminal organizations or a pregnant victim.
- A new specific crime would apply to anyone who habitually and for profit devotes an apartment, premises or other space to prostitution (so-called Tercería locativa Habitually devoting an apartment, premises or space, for profit, to prostitution taking place there.), with two to four years in prison and possible closure of the property. Agreeing to sexual acts in exchange for money would be punished with a fine, or prison if the other person is a minor or in a vulnerable situation. The person in prostitution would never be sanctioned.
- People in situations of prostitution would be recognized as direct victims for all purposes, with the rights and benefits under the Crime Victims' Statute and sexual freedom legislation.
Who it affects
- People who profit from someone else's prostitution: They could face prison and fines, even if the prostituted person consents.
- Those who habitually rent or provide apartments or premises for prostitution: They would commit a specific crime carrying prison and possible closure of the property.
- People who pay for sexual acts: They would face a fine, or prison if the other person is a minor or vulnerable.
- People in situations of prostitution: They would not be sanctioned and would be recognized as victims entitled to aid and protection.
Words worth knowing
- Proxenetismo
- Profiting from another person's prostitution, for example by facilitating or promoting it.
- Tercería locativa
- Habitually devoting an apartment, premises or space, for profit, to prostitution taking place there.
- Ánimo de lucro
- Intent to obtain an economic benefit or gain.
- Proposición de ley orgánica
- A bill submitted to the Congress to amend a special law, such as the Criminal Code. It is not an approved law yet.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced19 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 April 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
21 May 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, on the Penal Code, to prohibit pimping in all its forms.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 38· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 6 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 13 yes · 16 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Granada Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 8 yes · 19 no · 6 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 6 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 9 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 33, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 2
- Against: 33
- Tie: 17
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 25 against · 2 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 4 in favour · 4 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 135 against · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 abst. · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to punish pimping and those who pay for sex
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000077
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 38
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.