Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to punish pimping and those who pay for sex

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 19 March 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, on the Penal Code, to prohibit pimping in all its forms.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000077· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would amend the Criminal Code to punish pimping in general terms, without requiring exploitation of the prostituted person. According to its authors, that current requirement has led to practical impunity for this conduct.
  2. Anyone who, for profit, promotes, favors or facilitates the prostitution of another person, even with that person's consent, would face two to four years in prison and a fine. Penalties would be harsher in cases involving violence, deception, abuse of a situation of need, criminal organizations or a pregnant victim.
  3. A new specific crime would apply to anyone who habitually and for profit devotes an apartment, premises or other space to prostitution (so-called Tercería locativa Habitually devoting an apartment, premises or space, for profit, to prostitution taking place there.), with two to four years in prison and possible closure of the property. Agreeing to sexual acts in exchange for money would be punished with a fine, or prison if the other person is a minor or in a vulnerable situation. The person in prostitution would never be sanctioned.
  4. People in situations of prostitution would be recognized as direct victims for all purposes, with the rights and benefits under the Crime Victims' Statute and sexual freedom legislation.

Who it affects

  • People who profit from someone else's prostitution: They could face prison and fines, even if the prostituted person consents.
  • Those who habitually rent or provide apartments or premises for prostitution: They would commit a specific crime carrying prison and possible closure of the property.
  • People who pay for sexual acts: They would face a fine, or prison if the other person is a minor or vulnerable.
  • People in situations of prostitution: They would not be sanctioned and would be recognized as victims entitled to aid and protection.

Words worth knowing

Proxenetismo
Profiting from another person's prostitution, for example by facilitating or promoting it.
Tercería locativa
Habitually devoting an apartment, premises or space, for profit, to prostitution taking place there.
Ánimo de lucro
Intent to obtain an economic benefit or gain.
Proposición de ley orgánica
A bill submitted to the Congress to amend a special law, such as the Criminal Code. It is not an approved law yet.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced19 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 April 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2024Apr 202411. 19 March 2024: Presentación22. 2 April 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/04/2024 hasta 05/04/202433. 2 April 2024: Calificación44. 5 April 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 05/04/2024 hasta 08/04/202455. 8 April 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/04/2024 hasta 21/05/202466. 21 May 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 21/05/2024 hasta 27/05/2024

21 May 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 122 yes · 184 no · 36 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, on the Penal Code, to prohibit pimping in all its forms.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 38· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 33, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 2
  • Against: 33
  • Tie: 17
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
25 against · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
118 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
4 in favour · 4 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
135 against · 2 did not vote
VOX33
32 abst. · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.