What it is
Bill to expand the cases the Audiencia Nacional A Spanish court that tries very serious crimes nationwide, such as terrorism or major drug trafficking cases. can try
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 March 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding the delimitation of the competences of the National Court for the trial of crimes of drug trafficking, money laundering, and human trafficking by criminal organizations.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000062· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, filed by the Popular Party group in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) and not yet passed, would amend Article 65 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary to better define which crimes the Audiencia Nacional tries.
- For drug trafficking, the Audiencia Nacional would hear cases committed by criminal organizations, serious cases under the Criminal Code, and cases by organized groups affecting several judicial territories, even if they operate in a single province.
- It would also cover money laundering linked to drug trafficking, and human trafficking and smuggling committed by criminal organizations with effects in different judicial territories.
- A new provision would bring the rule on terrorism crimes into the law itself, since that jurisdiction already belonged to the Audiencia Nacional under a 1977 royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses..
Who it affects
- Judges and prosecutors of the Audiencia Nacional: They would have clearer assignment of serious drug trafficking, money laundering and human trafficking cases.
- Drug trafficking criminal organizations: Their most relevant cases could be investigated and tried by the Audiencia Nacional even if they act in a single province.
- Victims and people affected by these gangs: The bill seeks a more effective judicial response to organizations that spread terror.
Words worth knowing
- Audiencia Nacional
- A Spanish court that tries very serious crimes nationwide, such as terrorism or major drug trafficking cases.
- Blanqueo de capitales
- Money laundering: hiding money from criminal activity so it looks legal.
- Trata de personas
- Human trafficking: recruiting and exploiting people, for example for forced labor.
- Audiencia (territorial)
- The territorial area covered by the high courts of each autonomous community; a crime affecting several is considered broader in scope.
- Proposición de ley orgánica
- A bill filed in Congress that, if passed, would amend an organic law, a type of Spanish law requiring a special majority.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced4 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted12 March 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
25 June 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding the delimitation of the competences of the National Court for the trial of crimes of drug trafficking, money laundering, and trafficking of persons by criminal organizations.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 50· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 12, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 31
- Against: 12
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 25 against · 2 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 117 against · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 1 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 133 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000062
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 50
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.