Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to expand the cases the Audiencia Nacional A Spanish court that tries very serious crimes nationwide, such as terrorism or major drug trafficking cases. can try

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 March 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding the delimitation of the competences of the National Court for the trial of crimes of drug trafficking, money laundering, and human trafficking by criminal organizations.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000062· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, filed by the Popular Party group in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) and not yet passed, would amend Article 65 of the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on the Judiciary to better define which crimes the Audiencia Nacional tries.
  2. For drug trafficking, the Audiencia Nacional would hear cases committed by criminal organizations, serious cases under the Criminal Code, and cases by organized groups affecting several judicial territories, even if they operate in a single province.
  3. It would also cover money laundering linked to drug trafficking, and human trafficking and smuggling committed by criminal organizations with effects in different judicial territories.
  4. A new provision would bring the rule on terrorism crimes into the law itself, since that jurisdiction already belonged to the Audiencia Nacional under a 1977 royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses..

Who it affects

  • Judges and prosecutors of the Audiencia Nacional: They would have clearer assignment of serious drug trafficking, money laundering and human trafficking cases.
  • Drug trafficking criminal organizations: Their most relevant cases could be investigated and tried by the Audiencia Nacional even if they act in a single province.
  • Victims and people affected by these gangs: The bill seeks a more effective judicial response to organizations that spread terror.

Words worth knowing

Audiencia Nacional
A Spanish court that tries very serious crimes nationwide, such as terrorism or major drug trafficking cases.
Blanqueo de capitales
Money laundering: hiding money from criminal activity so it looks legal.
Trata de personas
Human trafficking: recruiting and exploiting people, for example for forced labor.
Audiencia (territorial)
The territorial area covered by the high courts of each autonomous community; a crime affecting several is considered broader in scope.
Proposición de ley orgánica
A bill filed in Congress that, if passed, would amend an organic law, a type of Spanish law requiring a special majority.
royal decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced4 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted12 March 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2024Apr 2024May 202411. 4 March 2024: Presentación22. 12 March 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 12/03/2024 hasta 15/03/202433. 12 March 2024: Calificación44. 15 March 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 15/03/2024 hasta 24/04/202455. 24 April 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 24/04/2024 hasta 25/06/202466. 25 June 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 25/06/2024 hasta 01/07/2024

25 June 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 167 yes · 173 no

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, regarding the delimitation of the competences of the National Court for the trial of crimes of drug trafficking, money laundering, and trafficking of persons by criminal organizations.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 50· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 12, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 31
  • Against: 12
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
25 against · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
117 against · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
1 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
133 in favour · 4 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.