Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to solve unresolved ETA crimes and protect victims

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 October 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law on unresolved ETA crimes and their victims to comply with the report of April 21, 2022, of the European Parliament Committee on Petitions (PE702.917v03-00).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000017· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the Popular Party group in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados), aims to comply with the April 21, 2022 report by the European Parliament's Petitions Committee, which points to 379 unresolved ETA murders, 44% of the total.
  2. It would ban tributes and acts glorifying terrorism. Public authorities would have to remove monuments and plaques, and government authorities could suspend or dissolve acts that humiliate victims. City councils could not facilitate banned gatherings, and the responsible officials would be personally liable for fines.
  3. It would push for an investigation of unresolved cases within three months, involving the Public Prosecutor's Office and the State Law Enforcement Agencies, without first assessing whether the crimes have expired under the statute of limitations. It also provides for a panel of jurists to prepare a report on each pending case file and a call for people to cooperate confidentially and anonymously.
  4. It would require those convicted of terrorism to pay civil damages, cooperate in investigating pending crimes, and credibly ask victims for forgiveness before getting prison benefits, third-degree classification, or parole, with reports from the National Court (Audiencia Nacional) verifying this.
  5. It would toughen the crime of glorifying terrorism: it would also punish acts or messages that humiliate victims or their relatives, with prison sentences of one to three years and fines of twelve to eighteen months, and would let judges order the removal of online content.
  6. The bill would be an organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. in articles 2 through 5 and an ordinary law in article 1, and would take effect on the day of its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Victims of ETA terrorism and their families: They would get more protection against humiliation and tributes, and would be personally informed of any change in the legal status of their case.
  • People convicted of terrorism: They would need to cooperate with justice, pay civil damages, and ask for forgiveness to get prison benefits or parole.
  • People who organize or take part in tributes to terrorists: Their acts could be banned and they could face harsher criminal penalties.
  • City councils and their officials: They could not facilitate banned gatherings and would be personally liable for fines if they did.
  • The Public Prosecutor's Office and the State Law Enforcement Agencies: They would have to push forward investigations of the unresolved ETA cases.

Words worth knowing

Ley orgánica (organic law)
A law that, because it deals with rights and freedoms, needs more votes to pass than a regular law.
Beneficio penitenciario (prison benefit)
Advantages for a person in prison, such as early release or serving the sentence under a lighter regime.
Tercer grado (third degree)
The last and most flexible level of serving a prison sentence, allowing the inmate to leave the facility for most of the day.
Prescripción (statute of limitations)
When a crime can no longer be prosecuted or tried because too much time has passed since it was committed.
Responsabilidad civil (civil liability)
The money the convicted person must pay to repair the harm caused by the crime.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced26 October 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 November 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2023Nov 2023Dec 2023Jan 202411. 26 October 2023: Presentación22. 3 November 2023: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 03/11/2023 hasta 08/11/202333. 3 November 2023: Calificación44. 8 November 2023: Gobierno Contestación desde 08/11/2023 hasta 18/12/202355. 18 December 2023: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 18/12/2023 hasta 06/02/202466. 6 February 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 06/02/2024 hasta 12/02/2024

6 February 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 175 no

Voted on: From the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic motion on unsolved ETA crimes and their victims for the fulfillment of the report of April 21, 2022, of the European Parliament Committee on Petitions (PE702.917v03-00).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 19· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 11, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 30
  • Against: 11
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista121
119 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
6 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto7
1 in favour · 6 against
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.