What it is
The bill would cut the workweek to 37.5 hours
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 9 May 2025. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill to reduce the maximum duration of the ordinary working day and to guarantee the registration of working hours and the right to disconnect.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000058· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would reduce the maximum ordinary working day to 37.5 hours of effective work per week on yearly average. The current legal maximum is 40 hours per week.
- It would strengthen the right to disconnect: the company could not ask for work through digital means outside agreed hours, and refusing those requests could not bring retaliation or worse treatment for the worker.
- It would create a new daily working-time record kept through digital means, which each worker would fill in personally and directly when starting and ending the workday. Companies would have to keep the records for four years, and failing to comply can lead to the contract being presumed full time.
- The reduction of working hours could not affect salaries nor eliminate more favorable rights or conditions that workers already had.
- Collective agreements and companies without one would have until December 31, 2025 to adapt to the new working day. Part-time contracts with hours equal to or above the new maximum would automatically become full-time contracts.
- It would toughen penalties for breaking working-time rules: missing records or falsified data would count as one violation per affected worker, with fines from €1,000 to €10,000 in the cases covered.
Who it affects
- Employees: They would work at most 37.5 hours per week on yearly average, with no salary cut.
- Companies: They would have to adapt working hours and agreements before December 31, 2025 and keep a digital working-time record, with tougher fines if they fail to comply.
- Negotiating committees of collective agreements: They would have until December 31, 2025 to adapt their working hours to the new maximum.
- Domestic workers: Their maximum working day would be adjusted to the new rule, and their working-time record could be kept by any physical or digital means suited to their resources.
- Part-time workers: Part-time contracts with hours equal to or above the new maximum would become full time; the rest would keep their hours with a proportional salary increase.
Words worth knowing
- Registro de jornada (working-time record)
- A daily log of when each worker starts and finishes work, which the company must keep.
- Convenio colectivo (collective agreement)
- An agreement negotiated between unions and employers that sets working conditions for a sector or company.
- Horas complementarias (complementary hours)
- Extra hours that can be agreed with a part-time worker, in addition to their ordinary hours.
- Cómputo anual (yearly average)
- A calculation of working hours spread over the whole year, instead of fixing them by the week.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced9 May 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted13 May 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments16 May 2025Groups propose changes.
- Committee19 June 2025A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
10 September 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Joint vote on the amendments for return to the Government bill to reduce the maximum duration of the ordinary working day and guarantee the record of working hours and the right to disconnect, submitted by the Junts per Catalunya, VOX, and Popular Parliamentary Groups in the Congress.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 10 of sitting 130· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 10 yes · 22 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 10
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 1 in favour · 8 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000058
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 10 of sitting 130
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.