What it is
Bill would protect minors online with controls, training and fines
Committee step 4 of 7· LapsedIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 27 March 2025. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Government bill for the protection of minors in digital environments.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000052· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require makers of cell phones, tablets, game consoles and other internet-connected devices to include a free parental control feature, activated by default when the device is first set up, and to warn on packaging and in manuals about the risks of harmful content for minors. Failing to comply would be a serious offense, with fines of up to two million euros.
- Minors would be banned from accessing or activating random reward mechanisms (loot boxes in video games), understood as those whose outcome is random and yields virtual items exchangeable for money. Regulations could allow exceptions.
- Schools would have to regulate the use of cell phones and digital devices in classrooms, extracurricular activities and supervised breaks, according to rules set by education authorities. Digital training for students and teachers would also be promoted.
- Victims of gender violence or sexual violence committed through digital environments would have the status of victims under those laws, with access to information, psychosocial support and legal advice services 24 hours a day, every day of the year.
- The Criminal Code would be reformed to allow penalties banning access to social networks and virtual spaces related to the crime, to punish the distribution of AI-generated fake images or voices of a sexual or degrading nature, and to increase penalties when fake identities are used against minors.
- The minimum age for a minor to consent on their own to the processing of their personal data would rise to 16; until then, those with parental authority or guardianship would decide. Consents already given by minors under 16 would remain valid unless revoked.
- Video platforms and audiovisual services, including those based outside the European Union that target Spain, would have to use age verification systems to keep minors away from the most harmful content, such as pornography or gratuitous violence, and offer parental controls. The CNMC could fine them and even suspend the service for up to one year.
- Companies selling goods or services for adults only, because of their sexual or violent content or their health risks, would have to verify the customer's age before the sale; failing to do so would be a minor offense under consumer protection law.
Who it affects
- Families and minors: They would get more protection from harmful content, built-in parental controls and 24-hour support services.
- Makers of cell phones, tablets, consoles and similar devices: They would have to include parental controls activated by default and risk warnings, with fines of up to two million euros.
- Schools and teachers: They would have to regulate cell phone use at school and strengthen digital training.
- Digital companies, audiovisual platforms and internet providers: They would have to verify age, apply parental controls and keep harmful content away from minors, with penalties if they fail.
- Victims of digital violence: They would be recognized as victims and get access to 24-hour support services.
Words worth knowing
- Control parental (parental control)
- A device or service feature that lets adults limit or monitor what content and apps minors can access.
- Mecanismos aleatorios de recompensa (loot boxes)
- Video game features that, when paid to activate, give a random virtual prize, which can be exchanged for money or other virtual items.
- Ultrafalsificación (deepfake)
- An image or voice manipulated with technology, such as artificial intelligence, so it looks real when it is not.
- Ley orgánica (organic law)
- A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights, which requires a special majority in Congress to pass.
- CNMC
- Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia, the public body that oversees and penalizes telecommunications and audiovisual companies.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced27 March 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 April 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments11 April 2025Groups propose changes.
- Committee19 June 2025A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 8 official steps on a timeline
10 September 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the amendment for return to the Government bill for an Organic Law for the protection of minors in digital environments, submitted by the VOX Parliamentary Group.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 130· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 2 yes · 5 no · 5 abst.
- Almería More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 25 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Madrid More votes against 5 yes · 15 no · 16 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 5 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 7 no · 4 abst.
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 2 yes · 8 no · 6 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 15, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 15
- Abstained: 16
- Tie: 21
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 abst. |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000052
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 130
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.