What it is
Bill would end automatic dismissal over permanent disability
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 26 July 2024. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill by which the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23, is amended in matters of termination of the employment contract due to permanent incapacity of workers, and the consolidated text of the General Social Security Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 8/2015, of October 30, is amended in matters of permanent incapacity.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000033· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes that a ruling of total, absolute or great permanent disability no longer automatically ends the employment contract. The employer could only end it if reasonable accommodations are not possible, there is no compatible vacant position, or the worker rejects the change of position.
- A waiting period between the disability ruling and the accommodation or change of position would count as a suspension of the employment relationship, with the job held open, while the accommodations or the change are being resolved.
- The burden would be considered excessive based on the cost of the measures relative to the company's size, resources and total business volume, and it would not be excessive if public aid can cover it. In companies with fewer than 25 workers there is a cap: the cost cannot exceed the greater of the compensation under Article 56.1 or six months of the worker's salary.
- The worker would have ten calendar days from notice of the disability ruling to state in writing that they want to keep the job. The employer would have up to three months to make the accommodations or change of position, or to end the contract with a reasoned, written decision.
- If the employer adapts the position or moves the worker to another one and the contract is not ended, the permanent disability pension would be suspended while the worker holds that position, which is incompatible with the pension.
- Terminology would change: "gran invalidez" becomes "gran incapacidad" and "invalidez no contributiva" becomes "incapacidad no contributiva". Court cases over this type of dismissal would be urgent and given priority, and the Government must submit within six months a proposal on combining work with permanent disability, and within twelve months another one for the Civil Guard, National Police and Armed Forces.
Who it affects
- Workers ruled to have total, absolute or great permanent disability: They could ask in writing to keep their job, which would only end if accommodations are impossible, there is no compatible position, or they reject the change.
- Employers, especially those with fewer than 25 workers: They would have to try reasonable accommodations or position changes before ending contracts, with new deadlines and cost limits.
- People receiving or who will receive disability benefits: Rules on the permanent disability pension and its suspension if the person keeps working would be adjusted.
- The Government: It must submit reform proposals on combining work with permanent disability.
Words worth knowing
- Ajustes razonables (reasonable accommodations)
- Changes to the job or workplace needed so a person with a disability can work on equal terms, as long as they do not place an excessive burden on the employer.
- Incapacidad permanente total, absoluta o gran incapacidad
- Levels of disability recognized by Social Security: total for the usual occupation, absolute for any kind of work, and great disability when the person needs another person's help for basic daily activities.
- Reserva de puesto de trabajo (job reservation)
- The right to get the same job back when the suspension of the employment relationship ends.
- Pacto de Toledo
- A political agreement among Spain's parties to agree on reforms to the pension and Social Security system.
It summarizes the text passed by the Senado. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced26 July 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 September 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments13 September 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committee10 October 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate27 March 2025The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE22 April 2025It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
22 October 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole for return of the Government Bill amending the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23, regarding the termination of employment contracts due to permanent incapacity of workers, and the consolidated text of the General Social Security Law, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 8/2015, of October 30, regarding permanent incapacity, submitted by the VOX Parliamentary Group.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 69· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Almería More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 30 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 5 yes · 30 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 11 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 2 yes · 14 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto and Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 52
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 27 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 8 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000033
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 69
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.