What it is
The bill would update Spain's air navigation and aviation safety laws
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 9 May 2024. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill amending Law 48/1960, of July 21, on Air Navigation, and Law 21/2003, of July 7, on Air Safety.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000020· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend the 1960 Air Navigation Law and the 2003 Aviation Safety Law to align them with European rules and new technologies, such as unmanned aircraft (drones).
- At airports of general interest, a single Environmental Commission would be created, instead of several bodies, to deal with the infrastructure's environmental impact. It would include representatives of the State, the autonomous communities and affected municipalities.
- The rules on airport master plans and aeronautical easements, the limits on land use around airports and air navigation facilities, would be consolidated into one law. Construction in those areas would require a prior favorable approval from the State Aviation Safety Agency.
- The aircraft identification plate would be simplified: the owner's name would no longer be required, so the plate would not need to be replaced when the aircraft changes hands.
- New offenses would be created for violating drone rules (registration, identification, flight zones or remote pilot training), and offenses against non-acoustic aeronautical easements would be graded as minor, serious or very serious depending on their impact, instead of all being very serious.
- Remote pilots of drones would have to take breathalyzer and psychoactive substance tests when required by law enforcement, and cooperation by security forces would be arranged to help oversee these operations.
- The bill would create the Official College of Air Traffic Controllers of Spain, with voluntary membership, and the National Commission for Air Transport, bringing together the Transport minister and regional transport officials to coordinate airport policy and protect passenger rights.
- Extra budget credits would be approved to pay subsidies to scheduled air traffic from prior years and from 2024 and 2025, in the amounts of 319,211 and 1,200,000 thousand euros respectively, and the law would enter into force twenty days after publication in the Official State Gazette.
Words worth knowing
- Servidumbre aeronáutica (aeronautical easement)
- A legal limit on land use around airports and air navigation facilities, so there are no obstacles or noise that make safe operations impossible.
- Aeronave no tripulada (UAS)
- Commonly called a drone: an aircraft that flies without a pilot on board, controlled remotely.
- Plan director (master plan)
- A planning document that defines an airport's service area and plans its future development.
- Silencio administrativo negativo (negative administrative silence)
- If the administration does not answer in time, the request is deemed denied, unlike the usual rule.
- Comisión ambiental (Environmental Commission)
- A body where the State, autonomous communities and municipalities meet to advise on an airport's environmental impact.
It summarizes the text passed by the Senado. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced9 May 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted14 May 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments17 May 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committee5 December 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary8 April 2025All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate8 May 2025The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE17 September 2025It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
17 September 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendments to final provision three.bis (new).
This law had 14 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 25 of sitting 132· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 5 yes · 24 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 15 no · 5 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 18 most voted in favour; in 13, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 18
- Against: 13
- Tie: 21
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 1 in favour · 117 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 9 | 1 in favour · 7 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 abst. |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000020
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 25 of sitting 132
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.