Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to make working conditions clearer and more predictable

Committee step 4 of 7· Lapsed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 9 February 2024. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill amending the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of 23 October, and other provisions in labor matters, for the transposition of Directive (EU) 2019/1152 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 20 June 2019, on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000008· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require the employer to give workers written information about the essential elements of their employment relationship, both when it starts and whenever something changes, and this would apply to all contracts, including those under four weeks.
  2. It would define when a working condition is predictable: when the worker can know in advance, in writing, their work pattern or the criteria under which it may change. If the employer fails to inform about contract duration, working hours or the trial period, the contract would be presumed indefinite and full time.
  3. For part-time contracts, it would require the hours record to include the exact start and end times of each workday, make any change in hours voluntary, and require complementary hours agreements to state the reference days and hours when work can be requested, with at least three days notice.
  4. It would limit the trial period: at most six months for qualified professionals and two months for other workers, and one month for temporary contracts of six months or longer, reduced proportionally for shorter contracts.
  5. It would bar employers from prohibiting or limiting workers from working for other companies, and workers with at least six months on the job could request in writing a more stable or predictable form of employment, with a reasoned written answer within a set deadline.
  6. It would add penalties: failing to provide written information about the essential elements of the contract would be a serious offense, and treating a worker badly for having several jobs would be a very serious offense. The rule would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Workers, especially part-time, temporary or shift-based workers: They would receive more written information about their contract and their conditions would be more predictable.
  • Employers: They would face new information and record-keeping duties, with penalties if they fail to comply.
  • People who want to hold several jobs at once: The employer could not stop them or treat them badly for it, except for objective reasons.
  • Public sector employees: The rules on parallel employment and moving to another form of employment would apply to them, under their specific regulations.
  • Sea workers and domestic workers: The new rules would apply to them unless incompatible with the special features of their work.

Words worth knowing

Transposición de una directiva (transposition of a directive)
Adapting a European Union rule into Spanish law so it applies in Spain.
Horas complementarias (complementary hours)
Extra hours an employer can ask a part-time worker to work, if agreed in writing.
Pluriempleo (multiple employment)
Working for more than one company at the same time.
Periodo de prueba (trial period)
An initial period of the contract during which either side can end the relationship easily.
Infracción grave o muy grave (serious or very serious offense)
Categories of employer penalties: very serious is the most severe of the three levels (minor, serious, very serious).

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced9 February 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 February 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments16 February 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee21 March 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2024Dec 202511. 9 February 2024: Presentación22. 13 February 2024: Comisión de Trabajo, Eco. Social, Inclusión, S.Social y Migraciones Publicación desde 13/02/2024 hasta 16/02/202433. 13 February 2024: Calificación44. 16 February 2024: Comisión de Trabajo, Eco. Social, Inclusión, S.Social y Migraciones Enmiendas desde 16/02/2024 hasta 21/03/202455. 21 March 2024: Comisión de Trabajo, Eco. Social, Inclusión, S.Social y Migraciones Informe desde 21/03/2024 hasta 06/10/202666. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

21 March 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 331 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government Bill amending the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, approved by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23, and other provisions in labor matters, for the transposition of Directive (EU) 2019/1152 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of June 20, 2019, on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union, submitted by the VOX Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 33· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
24 in favour · 1 against · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
3 in favour · 4 abst.
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
6 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto8
7 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
133 in favour · 4 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.