What it is
Better working conditions for artists and technical staff
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 23 March 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 5/2022, of 22 March, adapting the regime of the special labor relationship of persons dedicated to artistic activities, as well as to the technical and auxiliary activities necessary for their development, and improving the working conditions of the sector.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000077· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The Workers' Statute now includes, as a special employment relationship, artists in the performing, audiovisual and musical arts, as well as the technical and auxiliary staff needed for that activity.
- The 1985 rules are updated: the scope now covers the internet and streaming, all contracts must be in writing, and the law defines what technical and auxiliary staff means.
- Fixed-term contracts can only be used for temporary needs, stating the cause and its link to the contract length. If this is not met, the worker becomes permanent.
- When a temporary contract ends, severance pay becomes 12 days of salary per year worked, or 20 days if the contract lasts more than 18 months.
- A reduced Social Security contribution is planned for self-employed artists earning under €3,000 a year, and the Government must adapt the rules on self-employed contributions.
- Contracts under this special relationship are exempt from the extra contribution for temporary contracts under 30 days. The law takes effect on March 31, 2022.
Who it affects
- Artists in theater, film, music, circus, dubbing and other performing, audiovisual and musical arts: They get written contracts, improved severance pay and tighter limits on temporary hiring.
- Technical and auxiliary show staff (setup, tailoring, hairdressing, makeup, etc.): They join the special employment relationship if their work is not structural or permanent for the company.
- Self-employed artists with low income: They may benefit from reduced Social Security contributions if they earn under €3,000 a year.
- Companies producing shows and artistic activities: They must adapt their contracts to the new rules on form, duration and termination.
Words worth knowing
- Relación laboral de carácter especial
- A special employment relationship with its own rules, different from the general ones, due to the nature of the activity.
- Cotización
- The money paid to Social Security for working or being self-employed, which gives access to pensions and benefits.
- Fijo discontinuo
- A worker with a permanent contract who only works when the company has activity, on an intermittent basis.
- Real decreto-ley
- A rule with the force of law that the Government can pass urgently, without going through the full parliamentary process first.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced23 March 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted30 March 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary30 March 2022All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
7 April 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 5/2022, of 22 March, adapting the regime of the special labor relationship of persons dedicated to artistic activities, as well as to the technical and auxiliary activities necessary for their development, and improving the working conditions of the sector.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 171· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 16 yes · 14 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 16 no · 3 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 7 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Republicano, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 17 most voted in favour; in 17, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 17
- Against: 17
- Tie: 18
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 5 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 33 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 4 in favour · 7 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000077
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 171
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2022-4583
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.