What it is
Proposal to let regional governments cap rental prices
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 October 2022. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de las Illes Balears-Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 29/1994, of November 24, on Urban Leases.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000019· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, submitted by the Parliament of the Balearic Islands, would amend the Urban Leases Law so that autonomous communities could set rent containment or moderation schemes for housing. Currently, Article 17 of that law says the price is freely set by the landlord and the tenant.
- The bill would add an extraordinary extension of up to three more years for leases of a primary residence in stressed residential market areas, at the tenant's request, which the landlord must accept with some exceptions.
- Autonomous communities could declare stressed residential market areas, backed by a report with objective data and a specific action plan. In island territories and metropolitan areas, the whole area would count as stressed even if only part of it meets the requirements.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Tenants of primary residences in stressed areas: Could request extraordinary lease extensions and be protected by rent caps if their region approves them.
- Landlords: In stressed areas they could see their freedom to set rent limited and would have to accept extraordinary extensions, with some exceptions.
- Autonomous communities: Could approve rent containment schemes, declare stressed areas, and create penalty rules and out-of-court dispute resolution systems.
Words worth knowing
- Prórroga del contrato
- Extending the lease beyond its end date under the same conditions.
- Zona de mercado residencial tensionado
- Stressed residential market area: an area lacking affordable housing, with risk that supply will not be enough for the population.
- Arrendador y arrendatario
- Arrendador is the landlord; arrendatario is the tenant.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced17 October 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted26 October 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
7 March 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliament of the Balearic Islands, amending Law 29/1994, of November 24, on Urban Leases.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 240· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 15 yes · 14 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 7 yes · 29 no
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 10 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 12 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Ciudadanos, Sin grupo, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 45, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 45
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 5 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 33 in favour |
| GPlu | 12 | 8 in favour · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 87 | 87 against |
| VOX | 52 | 1 in favour · 51 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Senate Private member's bill amending Law 29/1994, of November 24, on Urban Leases.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000019
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 240
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.