What it is
Bill proposes better pay protection for living organ donors
Admitted step 2 of 7 · UnfinishedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 April 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill to improve the protection of living organ donors for subsequent transplantation.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000321· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create a special temporary disability situation for living organ donors. It would cover both the days of medical preparation before surgery and the period from hospital admission until discharge after recovery.
- No prior Social Security contributions would be required to receive the benefit. The subsidy would be 100 % of the calculating base and would be paid from the first day of sick leave.
- Employees would get paid leave for the preparatory steps of donation, such as medical reports, exams or giving consent, if they take place during working hours.
- Public employees would have the same paid leave for the time needed for the preparatory steps of the donation.
- Court administration staff would be covered by this special situation. For the first six months they would receive all their pay, and afterwards a subsidy of 100 % of their complementary pay.
- The same protections would apply to Armed Forces personnel and State civil servants. In both cases, they would receive full pay for the first four months and then a subsidy of 100 % of their complementary pay.
Who it affects
- People who donate an organ while alive and work as employees or self-employed: They would get a special sick leave with no minimum contribution period and a 100 % subsidy from day one.
- Employees: They would get paid leave to attend the preparatory steps of the donation.
- Public employees and court administration staff: They would have the same leave and a special sick leave with 100 % of their pay.
- Armed Forces personnel and State civil servants: They would be covered by this special situation with specific economic benefits.
Words worth knowing
- Incapacidad temporal
- Temporary disability: sick leave while a person cannot work and receives medical care.
- Base reguladora
- The reference amount used to calculate how much a benefit pays.
- Cotización
- Contributions that workers and employers pay to Social Security, which give the right to benefits.
- Permiso retribuido
- Paid leave: absence from work for a legal reason while still receiving pay.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced17 April 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted27 April 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
18 May 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, for the improvement of the protection of living organ donors for their subsequent transplant.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 46 of sitting 262· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 27 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 33 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 14 yes · 1 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 11 | 6 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 26 in favour · 1 against · 6 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 10 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 49 in favour · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Passed· nearly the same title Bill proposes better pay protection for living organ donors
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000321
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 46 of sitting 262
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.