What it is
Criminal Code reform: payments, corruption, sedition and smuggling
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 11 November 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law on the transposition of European directives and other provisions for the adaptation of criminal legislation to the legal system of the European Union, and reform of crimes against moral integrity, public disorder, and smuggling of dual-use weapons.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000271· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Criminal protection is extended to non-cash payment methods, including cards, virtual currencies and crypto-assets used to pay. Their fraud, forgery and preparatory acts are punished, and what counts as a payment instrument is defined.
- The transposition of European directives is completed: penalties are raised for insider dealing offenses committed by people without reserved access to the inside information, and criminal liability can be waived for those who actively cooperate in detecting cartels.
- The crime of embezzlement (malversación) is reformed, returning to the traditional model: it distinguishes between appropriating public funds, using them temporarily for private purposes, and diverting them to other public uses, with different penalties for each. Public property is defined and repairing the damage is rewarded.
- The crime of illicit enrichment is introduced in Spain for the first time: a public official who gains assets worth more than €250,000 above their proven income and refuses to justify it when required by the competent bodies faces prison, a fine and disqualification from office.
- The crime of sedition is abolished and the crime of public disorder is reformed: it now requires acting as a group, using violence or intimidation, and aiming to attack public peace. An aggravated form is created for crowds capable of seriously affecting public order.
- The period from December 24 to January 6 is declared non-business days for procedural deadlines, to allow rest and work-life balance for lawyers, court clerks and social graduates. The Audiencia Nacional will hear smuggling cases involving defense material and dual-use goods, whose conspiracy and proposal are also punished.
Who it affects
- People who use cards, electronic wallets or virtual currencies: They get stronger criminal protection against fraud and forgery of these payment methods.
- Public authorities and officials: They face reformed penalties for embezzlement and, for the first time, illicit enrichment if they cannot justify their assets.
- Executives and employees of companies involved in cartels: They can be exempt from criminal liability if they actively cooperate with competition authorities.
- People taking part in riots or disturbances: They are no longer charged with sedition; they are charged under the new public disorder offense, with graduated penalties.
- Lawyers, court clerks and social graduates working before the courts: The Christmas period becomes non-business time for procedural deadlines, favoring their rest and work-life balance.
Words worth knowing
- Transposition of directives
- The duty to incorporate into Spanish law the rules approved by the European Union.
- Malversación (embezzlement of public funds)
- Crime committed by an authority or official who uses the public property they manage for purposes other than those intended, or for private benefit.
- Enriquecimiento ilícito (illicit enrichment)
- Crime of a public official who cannot explain the origin of a large increase in their wealth and refuses to do so before the competent bodies.
- Sedición (sedition)
- Crime abolished by this law: publicly and tumultuously rising up to achieve certain goals by force.
- Cártel (cartel)
- A secret agreement between companies to avoid competition, for example by fixing prices.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced11 November 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted14 November 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments25 November 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committee29 November 2022A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary13 December 2022All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate15 December 2022The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE22 December 2022It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 14 official steps on a timeline
15 December 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the whole of the Private Member's Organic Bill for the transposition of European directives and other provisions to adapt criminal legislation to the legal order of the European Union, and to reform the offenses against moral integrity, public order, and smuggling of dual-use weapons, given its organic nature.
This law had 25 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 20 of sitting 226· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Almería Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 7 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Melilla No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 2 no
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 40 most voted in favour; in 2, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 40
- Against: 2
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 1 in favour · 6 against · 4 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 33 in favour |
| GPlu | 12 | 6 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 1 against · 87 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000271
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 20 of sitting 226
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2022-21800
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.