Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to toughen penalties for squatting in Spain

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 June 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill aimed at combating the phenomenon of squatting.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000235· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would toughen penalties for occupying a property: two to three years in prison if violence or intimidation is used, and six to twelve months for occupying a building that is not someone's home without authorization. It would also punish with prison and a fine anyone who promotes or facilitates squatting.
  2. It would speed up eviction in criminal cases: the judge would have to order squatters out within a maximum of 48 hours from the request, with no bail required, if they cannot show a legal title justifying their stay. Squatting offenses would be handled through the fast-track criminal procedure.
  3. On the civil side, more people could request the immediate recovery of an occupied property (owners, legitimate possessors, nonprofits and public entities with social housing), and the waiting period between the payment demand and the eviction lawsuit for nonpayment would drop from thirty to ten days.
  4. Homeowners' associations would get broader powers to act against squatters: the cease-and-desist lawsuit could also target the occupant, even if unknown, and could combine eviction and recovery of possession. The ruling could bar the offender from using the property for up to three years.
  5. Most of the bill would be an organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes., although the second, third and fourth articles would be ordinary law. It would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Owners of squatted homes or premises, or of tenants who do not pay: They could recover the property faster, and squatters would face tougher penalties.
  • People who occupy someone else's property: They would face harsher prison terms and eviction within 48 hours.
  • Homeowners' associations and neighbors: They would find it easier to sue and to stop squatters' activities.
  • Nonprofits and public entities with social housing: They could use the fast-track procedure to recover properties.

Words worth knowing

Ley orgánica (organic law)
A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, requiring a special majority in Congress.
Usurpación (usurpation)
The crime of occupying someone else's property or taking over a right to it without entitlement.
Enervación del desahucio (staying an eviction)
When a tenant stops an eviction by paying what they owe within the given deadline.
Requerimiento fehaciente (verifiable demand)
An official notice whose date and receipt can be proven, such as the payment demand before a lawsuit.
Morada (dwelling)
A home where a person usually lives; it has stronger criminal protection.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced15 June 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted21 June 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 15 June 2022: Presentación22. 21 June 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 21/06/2022 hasta 24/06/202233. 21 June 2022: Calificación44. 24 June 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 24/06/2022 hasta 30/09/202255. 30 September 2022: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 30/09/2022 hasta 25/04/202366. 25 April 2023: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 25/04/2023 hasta 28/04/2023

25 April 2023

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 150 yes · 186 no · 3 abst.

Voted on: Organic Private Member's Bill of the VOX Parliamentary Group aimed at combating the phenomenon of squatting.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 254· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 20
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
12 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
118 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
4 in favour · 3 against · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
30 against · 3 did not vote
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
86 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX52
51 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.