What it is
Proposal to toughen penalties for squatting in Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 June 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's Organic bill aimed at combating the phenomenon of squatting.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000235· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would toughen penalties for occupying a property: two to three years in prison if violence or intimidation is used, and six to twelve months for occupying a building that is not someone's home without authorization. It would also punish with prison and a fine anyone who promotes or facilitates squatting.
- It would speed up eviction in criminal cases: the judge would have to order squatters out within a maximum of 48 hours from the request, with no bail required, if they cannot show a legal title justifying their stay. Squatting offenses would be handled through the fast-track criminal procedure.
- On the civil side, more people could request the immediate recovery of an occupied property (owners, legitimate possessors, nonprofits and public entities with social housing), and the waiting period between the payment demand and the eviction lawsuit for nonpayment would drop from thirty to ten days.
- Homeowners' associations would get broader powers to act against squatters: the cease-and-desist lawsuit could also target the occupant, even if unknown, and could combine eviction and recovery of possession. The ruling could bar the offender from using the property for up to three years.
- Most of the bill would be an organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes., although the second, third and fourth articles would be ordinary law. It would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Owners of squatted homes or premises, or of tenants who do not pay: They could recover the property faster, and squatters would face tougher penalties.
- People who occupy someone else's property: They would face harsher prison terms and eviction within 48 hours.
- Homeowners' associations and neighbors: They would find it easier to sue and to stop squatters' activities.
- Nonprofits and public entities with social housing: They could use the fast-track procedure to recover properties.
Words worth knowing
- Ley orgánica (organic law)
- A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, requiring a special majority in Congress.
- Usurpación (usurpation)
- The crime of occupying someone else's property or taking over a right to it without entitlement.
- Enervación del desahucio (staying an eviction)
- When a tenant stops an eviction by paying what they owe within the given deadline.
- Requerimiento fehaciente (verifiable demand)
- An official notice whose date and receipt can be proven, such as the payment demand before a lawsuit.
- Morada (dwelling)
- A home where a person usually lives; it has stronger criminal protection.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced15 June 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted21 June 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
25 April 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Organic Private Member's Bill of the VOX Parliamentary Group aimed at combating the phenomenon of squatting.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 254· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 20, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 20
- Against: 20
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 4 in favour · 3 against · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 30 against · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 86 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000235
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 254
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.