Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to end strict protection for wolves north of the Duero

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 March 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill on the conservation of the wolf in Spain and its coexistence with extensive livestock farming and the fight against the demographic challenge.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000210· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would guarantee protection of the wolf in Spain and adapt that protection to the species' current conservation status, based on scientific criteria, until the European Commission updates the annexes of the Habitats Directive.
  2. The bill would amend the annex of Royal Decree 139/2011 so that only the wolf population south of the Duero is listed in the List of Wild Species under Special Protection Regime.
  3. Until the European Commission updates the Directive's annexes, the current division would remain in place: wolf populations north of the Duero could be subject to management measures.
  4. The bill would expressly repeal Order TED/980/2021 of September 20, 2021, which placed the entire Spanish wolf population on the List.

Who it affects

  • Livestock farmers, especially extensive grazing farmers: They would find it easier to manage the wolf population north of the Duero to prevent damage to livestock.
  • Spanish regions (autonomous communities) with wolves: They could adopt population control measures north of the Duero, with more legal certainty.
  • Hunters: They are mentioned among the parties that would gain legal certainty from managing the species.
  • Wolf population south of the Duero: It would remain on the List of Wild Species under Special Protection Regime.

Words worth knowing

Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by members of the Spanish Congress or Senate (here, the Popular Party group). It must still go through the legislative process and is not law yet.
Directiva Hábitats (Habitats Directive)
A 1992 European rule requiring EU countries to protect natural habitats and wild species.
Listado de Especies Silvestres en Régimen de Protección Especial (LESPRE)
The official Spanish list of species and populations that receive special protection.
Medidas de gestión (management measures)
Actions that allow a protected species to be controlled, such as capture or culling, in certain cases.
Disposición derogatoria (repeal provision)
The part of a law that states which earlier rules stop applying.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced25 March 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 March 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2022Apr 202211. 25 March 2022: Presentación22. 30 March 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 30/03/2022 hasta 05/04/202233. 30 March 2022: Calificación44. 5 April 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 05/04/2022 hasta 17/05/202255. 17 May 2022: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/05/2022 hasta 24/05/202266. 24 May 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 24/05/2022 hasta 30/05/2022

24 May 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 143 yes · 175 no · 26 abst.

Voted on: Private Member's Bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, regarding the conservation of the wolf in Spain and its coexistence with extensive livestock farming and the fight against the demographic challenge.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 181· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Republicano, Socialista, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 11 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 18 most voted in favour; in 16, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 18
  • Against: 16
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 16
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 abst.
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 abst.
Mixto11
5 in favour · 4 against · 2 abst.
Ciudadanos9
8 abst. · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-gc33
31 against · 2 did not vote
GPlu12
8 against · 4 abst.
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
50 in favour · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.