What it is
Bill would lower protection for wolves in Spain
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 January 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill on the conservation of the wolf in Spain and its coexistence with extensive livestock farming and the fight against the demographic challenge.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000052· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would guarantee protection for the wolf in Spain, while adapting its level of protection to its current conservation status based on scientific criteria, as the European Commission has proposed.
- It would amend the annex of Royal Decree 139/2011 so that the wolf population south of the Duero stays on the List of Wild Species under Special Protection, but with the reference to its population changed.
- Within one month, the Government would have to call the Sectoral Conference on the Environment to approve a new strategy for managing and conserving the wolf, in line with the new protection system.
- Until the Bern Convention and the Habitats Directive are adapted, the current division would remain: wolves north of the Duero could be subject to management measures.
- It would expressly repeal Order TED/980/2021, which placed the entire Spanish wolf population on the List of Wild Species under Special Protection.
- The rule would be basic environmental legislation, would take effect the day after publication in the Official State Gazette, and the Government could issue the rules needed to apply it.
Who it affects
- Extensive livestock farmers: They would find it easier to coexist with the wolf, with more room to manage the species.
- Regional governments with wolves: They would regain the ability to apply wolf population management measures.
- The Spanish Government: It would have to call the Sectoral Conference on the Environment within one month and approve implementing rules.
- Hunters and public administrations: They would have a more flexible framework for managing the species.
Words worth knowing
- Listado de Especies Silvestres en Régimen de Protección Especial (LESPRE)
- Official Spanish list of animal and plant species that receive special protection.
- Directiva Hábitats (Habitats Directive)
- A 1992 European Union rule requiring member states to protect natural habitats and wild species.
- Convenio de Berna (Bern Convention)
- International treaty on wildlife conservation in Europe, signed by the EU and Spain.
- Conferencia Sectorial de Medio Ambiente
- Body where the Spanish Government and regional governments meet to coordinate environmental policy.
- Ganadería extensiva (extensive livestock farming)
- Farming where animals graze outdoors over large areas of land.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced24 January 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted30 January 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments6 May 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
23 April 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private Member's Bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, regarding the conservation of the wolf in Spain and its coexistence with extensive livestock farming and the fight against the demographic challenge.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 36· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 10 yes · 20 no
- Bizkaia Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 7, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 7
- Tie: 15
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 24 against · 3 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 5 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000052
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 36
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.