What it is
Proposal to let the regular courts review Court of Accounts rulings
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 January 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill reforming Ley Orgánica 2/1982, of 12 May, on the Court of Auditors and Ley 7/1988, of 5 April, on the Functioning of the Court of Auditors.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000197· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow appeals against the Court of Accounts' judicial decisions to be filed with the administrative litigation courts, instead of limiting review to the narrow cassation and review appeals now available before the Supreme Court. Its rulings could then be fully reviewed by a court that is part of the judiciary.
- The Court of Accounts' Adjudication Chambers would decide at first instance the account trials, the reimbursement proceedings and the bond cancellation files.
- The Accounts Counselors would handle the investigation of reimbursement proceedings, and the figure of the Investigating Delegate would disappear.
- The cassation and review appeals set out in the Law on the Operation of the Court of Accounts would be repealed, along with related articles and transitional provisions.
- The text justifies the change because the Court of Accounts depends on the Cortes Generales and its members are not judges, which the bill says conflicts with the right to a fair trial under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Who it affects
- People who handle public funds or property and may face accounting liability: They could appeal the Court of Accounts' rulings to a court within the judiciary.
- The Court of Accounts and its Accounts Counselors: The roles of its bodies would change: the Chambers would judge at first instance and the Counselors would investigate proceedings.
- The judiciary, specifically the administrative litigation courts: They would hear second-instance appeals in Court of Accounts matters.
Words worth knowing
- Reintegro por alcance
- Proceeding to require someone to return public money or property they were responsible for and failed to account for.
- Jurisdicción contable
- The function of judging the liability of people who manage public funds.
- Recurso de apelación
- Appeal allowing a higher court to review a case already decided.
- Casación y revisión
- Extraordinary appeals only available in very limited cases and for specific grounds, not for a full review.
- Orden contencioso-administrativo
- The branch of the judiciary that reviews the actions of public administrations.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced20 January 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 January 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
22 February 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plural Parliamentary Group, to amend Organic Law 2/1982, of May 12, on the Court of Auditors, and Law 7/1988, of April 5, on the Functioning of the Court of Auditors.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 153· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 1 yes · 11 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 18 yes · 14 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 7 yes · 26 no
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 10 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 12 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 44, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 44
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 10 | 2 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 7 against · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 34 | 33 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 85 against · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 50 against · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000197
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 153
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.