What it is
Bill to exempt credit-union-style cooperative credit sections from the mortgage loan law
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill for the reform of Law 5/2019, of 15 March, regulating residential credit contracts
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000172· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes to reform Law 5/2019, which regulates real estate credit contracts. Its authors argue that, because the law does not expressly exclude cooperatives with a credit section, it forces them to meet requirements designed for banks and credit cooperatives.
- According to the statement of reasons, a cooperative's credit section only lends money to its own members. This is self-financing, not a professional financial service, and these entities are governed by cooperative laws, not banking legislation.
- The bill would add a new provision to Article 2 of Law 5/2019 so that the law would not apply to loans made by cooperative credit sections to their own members, provided the cooperative's corporate purpose is different from professionally providing financial services.
- If passed, the law would enter into force the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Cooperatives with a credit section (agricultural, housing, worker cooperatives, etc.): They would no longer be subject to Law 5/2019 for loans to their members through their credit section.
- Members of those cooperatives: They would keep receiving loans from their cooperative's credit section under current conditions, outside the scope of Law 5/2019.
- Banks, financial institutions and credit cooperatives: They would still have to comply with the law, since they lend on a professional basis.
Words worth knowing
- Crédito inmobiliario
- A loan to buy or renovate real estate, such as a home, often secured by a mortgage.
- Cooperativa con sección de crédito
- A cooperative whose corporate purpose is not financial (agricultural, housing, etc.) but which has an internal part, the credit section, that lends money only to its members.
- Cooperativa de crédito
- A financial institution that professionally grants loans, such as rural savings banks. It should not be confused with a cooperative with a credit section.
- Objeto social
- The activity for which a company or entity is incorporated, as stated in its bylaws.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by members of Congress to become law. While it is being processed, it is not in force.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced26 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 November 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
27 September 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plural Parliamentary Group, for the reform of Law 5/2019, of 15 March, regulating real estate credit contracts.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 203· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 1 yes · 8 no · 3 abst.
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 16 yes · 13 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 7 yes · 23 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 7 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 9 no · 3 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 44, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 2
- Against: 44
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 3 in favour · 4 against · 4 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 32 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 7 in favour · 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 abst. · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000172
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 203
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.