What it is
Bill to use official Galician place names in maritime districts
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plural.
Official title: Private member's bill for the amendment of Royal Legislative Decree 2/2011, of 5 September, approving the Consolidated Text of the Law on State Ports and the Merchant Marine
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000171· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require state rules on Maritime Captaincies and Districts to use the official Galician names of the captaincies, districts and geographic features of Galiza, as set by the Galician language normalization law.
- A new provision would be added to the State Ports and Merchant Marine Law to adapt that place-name usage. In addition, the registration record of the maritime province of Vilagarcía de Arousa would change its code from 'VILL' to 'VIL'.
- The Government would then have to issue the regulatory rules needed to apply the change to the place names of captaincies, districts and geographic features of Galiza.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Vessels registered in the maritime province of Vilagarcía de Arousa, whose bow code would change from 'VILL' to 'VIL'.: Change of registration code.
- The Maritime Captaincies and Districts of Galiza, whose official names would be written in Galician.: Change of official names.
- The Government, which would have to adapt its implementing rules to the new place names.: New regulatory duty.
Words worth knowing
- Topónimo (place name)
- The official name of a place, such as a town, a cape or an island.
- Capitanía Marítima (Maritime Captaincy)
- A public office that manages maritime affairs along a stretch of coast.
- Distrito Marítimo (Maritime District)
- A coastal zone used to organize the registration and control of vessels.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text introduced by members of parliament to become a law; it is not yet approved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced22 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted26 October 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments30 May 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
18 May 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plural Parliamentary Group, to amend Royal Legislative Decree 2/2011, of September 5, approving the Consolidated Text of the Law on State Ports and the Merchant Marine.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 180· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 28 yes · 4 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 26 yes · 10 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 9 yes · 3 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 11 yes · 4 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Ciudadanos and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 50
- Against: 1
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 8 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 30 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000171
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 180
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.