Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to use official Galician place names in maritime districts

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plural.

Official title: Private member's bill for the amendment of Royal Legislative Decree 2/2011, of 5 September, approving the Consolidated Text of the Law on State Ports and the Merchant Marine

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000171· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require state rules on Maritime Captaincies and Districts to use the official Galician names of the captaincies, districts and geographic features of Galiza, as set by the Galician language normalization law.
  2. A new provision would be added to the State Ports and Merchant Marine Law to adapt that place-name usage. In addition, the registration record of the maritime province of Vilagarcía de Arousa would change its code from 'VILL' to 'VIL'.
  3. The Government would then have to issue the regulatory rules needed to apply the change to the place names of captaincies, districts and geographic features of Galiza.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Vessels registered in the maritime province of Vilagarcía de Arousa, whose bow code would change from 'VILL' to 'VIL'.: Change of registration code.
  • The Maritime Captaincies and Districts of Galiza, whose official names would be written in Galician.: Change of official names.
  • The Government, which would have to adapt its implementing rules to the new place names.: New regulatory duty.

Words worth knowing

Topónimo (place name)
The official name of a place, such as a town, a cape or an island.
Capitanía Marítima (Maritime Captaincy)
A public office that manages maritime affairs along a stretch of coast.
Distrito Marítimo (Maritime District)
A coastal zone used to organize the registration and control of vessels.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text introduced by members of parliament to become a law; it is not yet approved.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced22 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 October 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments30 May 2022Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 22 October 2021: Presentación22. 26 October 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/10/2021 hasta 29/10/202133. 26 October 2021: Calificación44. 29 October 2021: Gobierno Contestación desde 29/10/2021 hasta 09/12/202155. 9 December 2021: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 09/12/2021 hasta 18/05/202266. 18 May 2022: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 18/05/2022 hasta 24/05/202277. 24 May 2022: Comisión de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana Publicación desde 24/05/2022 hasta 30/05/202288. 30 May 2022: Comisión de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana Enmiendas desde 30/05/2022 hasta 30/05/202399. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

18 May 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 280 yes · 62 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plural Parliamentary Group, to amend Royal Legislative Decree 2/2011, of September 5, approving the Consolidated Text of the Law on State Ports and the Merchant Marine.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 180· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Ciudadanos and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 50
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto11
8 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst.
Ciudadanos9
9 against
Gcup-ec-gc33
30 in favour · 3 did not vote
GPlu12
11 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.