Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to equalize pay for all Spanish police forces

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 July 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill on the Remuneration of the Security Forces and Corps, amending Organic Law 2/1986, of March 13.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000151· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would add a new article to the organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on Security Forces and Corps to set basic rules on pay for all police officers, state and regional. Their pay would be equal in all cases.
  2. Pay amounts and raises would be set each year in the State General Budget Law. No administration could grant raises above the limits set in that law.
  3. Pay would be classified as basic and complementary. There would be two extra payments a year, and officers would be barred from receiving a share of fines or of any public administration revenue.
  4. A General Negotiating Table would be created, where the State and regional governments with police forces would negotiate with unions and professional associations. The annual pay raise would be a specific item for that table.
  5. The unification of category names and salaries would have to be proposed within two years of the law's publication. If the deadline passes, the Ministry of the Interior would do it directly. No officer would see their salary reduced: anyone hurt by the change would keep their amount as a temporary personal supplement.
  6. The new articles on basic principles and the common statute would also apply to the autonomous police of the Basque Country, Catalonia and Navarre's regional police. The law would take effect the day after publication in the Official State Gazette, except measures with budget costs.

Who it affects

  • Officers of the National Police and the Civil Guard (Guardia Civil): Their pay would be equalized with that of regional police forces, and they could not lose salary under the unification.
  • Officers of the autonomous police of the Basque Country and Catalonia, and Navarre's regional police: The basic principles and common statutory rules, including pay equality, would apply directly to them.
  • Regional governments with their own police forces: They would join the new General Negotiating Table and could not grant raises above the budget limits.
  • Police unions and professional associations: They would have representation at the General Negotiating Table to discuss the statute and pay.
  • The Ministry of the Interior: It would have to propose the unification of categories and salaries if no agreement is reached within two years.

Words worth knowing

Ley orgánica (organic law)
A special type of Spanish law used for major matters, such as fundamental rights or the statutes of the security forces. It requires an absolute majority in Congress to pass.
Retribuciones básicas y complementarias (basic and complementary pay)
Basic pay is the fixed salary based on the corps and seniority. Complementary pay covers extras for the job, professional career or performance.
Trienios
An extra payment received for every three years of service in the same corps.
Complemento Personal Transitorio (temporary personal supplement)
An amount kept in the paycheck so that no one earns less when a pay rule changes.
Mesa General de Negociación (General Negotiating Table)
A body where the administration and worker representatives negotiate conditions, in this case those of police officers.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced16 July 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted20 July 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Sept 202111. 16 July 2021: Presentación22. 20 July 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 20/07/2021 hasta 26/07/202133. 20 July 2021: Calificación44. 26 July 2021: Gobierno Contestación desde 26/07/2021 hasta 06/10/202155. 6 October 2021: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 06/10/2021 hasta 21/12/202166. 21 December 2021: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 21/12/2021 hasta 28/12/2021

21 December 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 155 yes · 190 no

Voted on: Organic Private member's bill from the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, on Remuneration of the Security Forces and Corps, amending Organic Ley 2/1986, of March 13.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 142· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 20
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto10
6 in favour · 1 against · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc34
34 against
GPlu12
11 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.