What it is
Bill would allow prison time for repeat petty theft
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 11 June 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's Organic bill regarding the amendment of Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code, in relation to the aggravating circumstance of multiple recidivism in the minor crime of theft.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000147· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend Article 235.1.7.º of the Criminal Code so that the repeat offender aggravating factor also applies to petty theft. Someone previously convicted of at least three crimes of the same nature could face one to three years in prison, even if the stolen goods are worth less than 400 euros.
- The proposal responds to a disagreement over how to apply the repeat offender rule after the 2015 reform. The State Attorney General's Office understood that the aggravating factor also applied to petty theft, but the Supreme Court, in ruling 481/2017, found it disproportionate and refused to apply it to petty offenses.
- The new rule would not follow the general repeat offender rules in the general part of the Criminal Code, namely Articles 22.8 and 66. Under those articles, prior convictions for petty offenses do not count.
- The sponsors, the VOX Parliamentary Group, justify the reform by the high number of thefts in Spain and by people who commit thefts repeatedly as a means of living. They argue that the fine provided for petty theft has proven ineffective at preventing this behavior.
- The law would be enacted under the state's authority over criminal legislation and would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People with multiple theft convictions: They could face one to three years in prison even when the new theft is petty, meaning under 400 euros.
- Businesses and the general public: The bill aims to protect their property against habitual thieves.
- Judges and courts: They would have an express rule to apply the repeat offender aggravating factor to petty theft, without the limits of Articles 22.8 and 66 of the Criminal Code.
Words worth knowing
- Delito leve (petty offense)
- A minor criminal offense punished with lighter penalties, such as a fine. Before 2015 it was called a 'falta'.
- Multirreincidencia (repeat offender aggravating factor)
- An aggravating factor applied when the person has already been convicted of at least three crimes of the same nature.
- Condena ejecutoria (final conviction)
- A conviction that is final, meaning it can no longer be appealed.
- Antecedentes cancelados (expunged records)
- Criminal records that are erased after a certain time and, as a rule, are not taken into account.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced11 June 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 June 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
24 May 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the VOX Parliamentary Group, Organic, relating to the amendment of Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code, regarding the aggravating circumstance of multiple recidivism in the minor crime of theft.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 181· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 26 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 19, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 20
- Against: 19
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 1 in favour · 117 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 4 in favour · 6 against · 1 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 31 against · 2 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000147
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 181
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.