Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to strengthen protection for crime victims

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 April 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill to improve the protection regime for victims of crime.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000141· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would expand crime victims' rights: victim associations could represent them if they expressly request it, and victims would have a stronger right to information from their first contact with authorities, including the option of receiving key court decisions by email.
  2. It would let victims take part in serving the sentence: they could appeal decisions such as moves to the open prison regime, conditional release or certain inmate leave, and file arguments before the judge decides, even if they were not a party to the trial.
  3. For inmates convicted of terrorism or crimes by criminal organizations, moving to the third-degree regime would require, in addition to paying civil liability, clear signs of abandoning violence and actively cooperating with authorities, proven by reports from the Audiencia Nacional and the prosecutor's office.
  4. The flexible serving model in prisons would be tightened: the technical team could only propose it if the inmate renounces their crimes, shows remorse and cooperates, and the supervising judge must approve it.
  5. Government authorities could suspend and dissolve gatherings or demonstrations held to honor convicts of crimes such as terrorism, city councils would be barred from facilitating them, and municipal officials who fail to comply would commit a very serious offense.
  6. The law would be enacted under state powers over criminal and procedural legislation, the Administration of Justice and equal rights for Spaniards, and would take effect the day after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado.

Who it affects

  • Direct and indirect crime victims, who would get more information and more power to appeal decisions about inmates.: More rights and participation in serving the sentence.
  • Victim associations, which could represent and defend victims who ask them to.: Standing to act on their behalf.
  • Inmates convicted of terrorism or crimes by criminal organizations.: Stricter requirements to move to the third-degree regime.
  • Organizers of tributes to convicts and city councils.: Ban on glorification events and penalties if facilitated.

Words worth knowing

Tercer grado (third-degree regime)
A semi-open prison regime where the inmate can work or live outside the prison under supervision.
Juez de Vigilancia Penitenciaria (prison supervising judge)
The judge who oversees how prison sentences are served and decides on leave and security levels.
Libertad condicional (conditional release)
Early release from prison before the full sentence is served, under conditions.
Victimización secundaria (secondary victimization)
Extra harm suffered by the victim from the legal process or treatment received, not from the crime itself.
Recurso de casación para la unificación de doctrina (cassation appeal to unify case law)
An appeal to the Supreme Court when lower courts have interpreted the law in conflicting ways.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced16 April 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted20 April 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2021Sept 2021Dec 202111. 16 April 2021: Presentación22. 20 April 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 20/04/2021 hasta 23/04/202133. 20 April 2021: Calificación44. 23 April 2021: Gobierno Contestación desde 23/04/2021 hasta 02/06/202155. 2 June 2021: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 02/06/2021 hasta 15/02/202266. 15 February 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 15/02/2022 hasta 21/02/2022

15 February 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 154 yes · 190 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill for an Organic Law by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to improve the protection regime for the victim of crime.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 150· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 20
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto10
5 in favour · 2 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc34
34 against
GPlu12
11 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.