What it is
Proposal to give all professional troops a permanent military job
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 September 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Act 39/2007, of 19 November, on the military career, in order to establish a single professional regime for professional military personnel.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000085· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create a single professional regime: officers, non-commissioned officers, and troops and sailors would all have the same service relationship, regulated by Law 39/2007, and Law 8/2006 on Troops and Sailors would be repealed.
- New soldiers and sailors would sign a three-year temporary commitment, renewable once up to a maximum of six years. With at least three years of service, a mid-level technician degree, and a fitness declaration, they could move to a permanent service relationship as career military personnel.
- The career of troops and sailors would be organized in three stages of about 12 years each: first operational posts in units, then junior command or specialist roles, and from age 45, logistics and administrative duties. At 56 they would move to the reserve.
- A share of civil service openings would be reserved for this personnel: between 10 and 30 percent in access to public employee positions (a mandatory minimum of 10 percent in the State Administration), at least 50 percent in Defense Ministry bodies, a minimum of 40 percent in the Guardia Civil, 10 percent in the National Police, and 20 percent in the Maritime Specialty of the Customs Surveillance Service.
- Time served in the Armed Forces would count as merit in civil service exams, and job placement support measures would be kept, such as occupational training and self-employment programs.
- Current personnel with a temporary commitment could extend it up to the six-year limit and, with at least three years of service, become career military personnel without the degree requirement during the first three years after the law takes effect. Complement officers under Law 17/1999 could also become career military personnel if they meet the requirements.
Who it affects
- Troops and sailors (military rank-and-file): They would be the main group affected: they could opt for a permanent military job instead of being forced out, with a three-stage career until the reserve at age 56.
- Complement officers: Those under the old Law 17/1999 could become career military personnel if they meet certain requirements.
- Foreign nationals with legal residence: They could keep joining the Armed Forces under temporary commitments, but could not renew them if they lose legal residence.
- People seeking public jobs: They would see shares of openings reserved in the Guardia Civil, National Police, Customs Surveillance Service, and other administrations for troops and sailors.
Words worth knowing
- Militar de carrera (career military member)
- A service member with a permanent service relationship with the Armed Forces, meaning a stable job until the reserve.
- Militar de complemento (complement officer)
- An officer with a temporary relationship, usually holding a university degree, who fills out the ranks.
- Compromiso de larga duración (long-term commitment)
- A temporary contract with the Armed Forces that can run up to age 45, typical of troops and sailors.
- Reservista de especial disponibilidad (special availability reservist)
- A service member who has finished their commitment but remains linked to the Armed Forces as a reserve, receiving an allowance.
- Formación profesional dual (dual vocational training)
- A training system that combines classroom teaching with hands-on practice in the actual job.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced16 September 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted22 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
18 May 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, to amend Law 39/2007, of November 19, on the military career, in order to establish a single professional regime for professional military personnel.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 98· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Barcelona More votes against 4 yes · 27 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 10 yes · 27 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 4 yes · 10 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 51, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 1
- Against: 51
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 11 against · 2 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 10 | 4 in favour · 3 against · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000085
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 98
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.