What it is
Proposal to let judges choose the judicial members of the CGPJ The General Council of the Judiciary, the body that governs judges: appointments, promotions and discipline.
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 February 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, for the reinforcement of judicial independence.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000034· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the Citizens parliamentary group (Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos) and admitted for processing in the Congress of Deputies, is not an approved law. It would change how the twelve judicial members of the General Council of the Judiciary are chosen: instead of being appointed by the Congress and the Senate, they would be elected directly by serving judges and magistrates through a personal, equal, direct and secret vote, with a single nationwide district and open lists.
- For the eight jurist members, the bill keeps their election by the Cortes Generales (four proposed by the Congress and four by the Senate, by a three-fifths majority), but adds that candidates must appear before the relevant committees so their merits and suitability can be assessed in a public hearing. It also limits any member to two consecutive terms.
- The bill would have judicial leadership posts, such as presidents of provincial courts, superior courts of justice and the National Court, elected by vote of the magistrates, and Supreme Court seats filled through merit-based competitions with objective scoring and a public defense of each candidate's merits.
- It creates a Professional Evaluation Commission within the General Council of the Judiciary, made up of four members, which would periodically assess the performance of all judges and magistrates using data such as the quality of rulings, the percentage of overturned decisions and average resolution times.
- It limits the so-called revolving door: a judge who has been on leave to run in elections or to take a freely appointed public office could not return to the judiciary until two years have passed since leaving that post, and on returning would have to step aside from cases where political parties they were linked to are parties to the case.
- Government Secretaries and Coordinating Secretaries would no longer be freely appointed and would instead be chosen through merit-based competitions with public calls. The law would enter into force the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, and the Council would have six months to issue the regulations needed to implement it.
Who it affects
- Judges and magistrates: They would directly elect the twelve judicial members of the Council and court presidents, and their promotion would be governed by merit competitions and performance reviews.
- Members of the General Council of the Judiciary: They would work on an exclusive basis, serve at most two consecutive terms and receive a single salary set in the State Budget Law.
- Jurists and lawyers: They could join the Council's jurist slate and Supreme Court magistrate seats, with a prior public hearing and experience requirements.
- Congress and Senate: They would stop appointing the twelve judicial members and would only choose the eight jurist members.
- Court clerks (Letrados de la Administración de Justicia): Government Secretaries and Coordinating Secretaries would be chosen by merit competition instead of free appointment.
Words worth knowing
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial (CGPJ)
- The body that governs judges in Spain: it oversees their training, promotions and disciplinary system.
- Vocal
- Each of the twenty members that make up the General Council of the Judiciary.
- Concurso de méritos
- A system for filling a post by objectively comparing the merits of the candidates.
- Puertas giratorias (revolving door)
- Movement of a judge or public official into another public or private post, with a possible conflict of interest.
- Tres quintos (three-fifths)
- A reinforced majority: three out of five votes, required to appoint Council members.
- CGPJ
- The General Council of the Judiciary, the body that governs judges: appointments, promotions and discipline.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced18 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
22 September 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, for the reinforcement of judicial independence.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 43· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 5 yes · 20 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 15 no · 2 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-gc. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 19, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 21
- Against: 19
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 4 in favour · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 34 against · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 1 in favour · 1 against · 10 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 50 in favour · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to let judges choose the governing council members
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000034
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 43
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.