What it is
Bill to expand family benefits and make work-life balance easier
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 February 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.
Official title: Private member's bill on the Comprehensive Protection and Support for Families.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000028· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would make every family with two or more children a large family, and give special-category status to families with three or more children, instead of the current five or more.
- For the first time, it would create a protection scheme for single-parent families: they would get the same benefits as large families, and single-parent families with two or more children would be special category. Their birth or adoption leave would be 36 weeks.
- It would recognize work-life balance as an individual right for all workers and strengthen its court protection: if the employer refuses to adapt working hours, the worker can go to the labor court within 20 days, through an urgent, priority procedure.
- It would create a time bank of at least 5 % of annual working hours for family matters, allow converting up to seven vacation days into hours for personal matters, and expand reduced schedules for caring for elderly or dependent relatives, which could be accumulated into full days off.
- It would raise birth, adoption and foster care leave to 18 weeks for each parent (36 in total), make it flexible until the child turns twelve months, and add eight weeks if the child has a disability or there is a multiple birth.
- It would extend the birth and childcare allowance to men and to adoption or foster care cases, and create 100 % exemptions from employer Social Security contributions during leave and for replacement contracts.
- It would equalize the rights of unmarried couples and married couples: unmarried couples could be recognized as large families, get 15 days of paid leave, file joint income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. returns, and access survivor's pension, death grant and workplace accident compensation on equal terms.
- It would require the Government to pass several rules and programs: an unmarried couples law, free first-cycle preschool for children under three, school cafeteria grants, extended school hours, free summer English activities, and a state pact on more rational working schedules.
Who it affects
- Families with two or more children and single-parent families: They would qualify as large families and receive their benefits, with fewer requirements than now.
- Workers: They would get more leave, a time bank and easier ways to reduce hours or work remotely.
- Employers: They would get 100 % exemptions from Social Security contributions during leave and replacements, plus more duties on equality and work-life balance plans.
- Unmarried couples: They would be equal to married couples in tax, labor and Social Security benefits.
- Families with young children: Cafeteria grants, extended school hours and free first-cycle preschool are proposed.
Words worth knowing
- Familia numerosa de categoría especial (special-category large family)
- A type of large family with extra benefits because it has more children or children with disabilities.
- Bolsa de horas (time bank)
- A yearly reserve of working hours the employee can use for family matters and then make up.
- Subsidio por nacimiento y cuidado de menor (birth and childcare allowance)
- A Social Security payment for people who lack enough contributions to receive the standard birth benefit.
- Pareja de hecho (unmarried couple)
- Two people living together in a stable, public relationship without being married.
- Excedencia (unpaid leave)
- A situation where the worker temporarily stops working but keeps the right to return to the job.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced7 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted11 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
16 March 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, for Comprehensive Protection and Support for Families.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 83· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 22 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-gc. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 21, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 21
- Against: 21
- Tie: 10
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 6 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 11 | 7 in favour · 2 against · 2 abst. |
| Sin grupo | 2 | 1 in favour · 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 51 | 51 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to expand family benefits, work-life balance and unmarried couples' rights
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000028
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 83
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.