Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would reform pensions: sustainability, gender gap and minimum pensions

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 30 March 2023. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill for urgent measures to expand the rights of pensioners, reduce the gender gap, and establish a new framework for the sustainability of the public pension system (originating from Royal Decree-Law 2/2023, of March 16).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000150· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create an Intergenerational Equity Mechanism: an extra 1.2 percentage point contribution that goes to the Social Security reserve fund. It replaces the old sustainability factor and would apply from 2023 to 2050.
  2. A solidarity contribution would be created for wages above the maximum contribution base, with rates of 5.5%, 6% and 7% by bracket. It would phase in gradually from 2025 to 2045.
  3. The maximum contribution base would rise each year, on top of inflation, by 1.2 percentage points from 2024 to 2050. The maximum pension would also rise, with a slight delay, to compensate those who contribute more.
  4. The retirement pension calculation would change: instead of the last 25 years, a 27-year period would be used, automatically dropping the 24 months with the lowest contributions. Those retiring between 2026 and 2040 could choose whichever rule is more favorable.
  5. The gender gap supplement would be expanded and could also be claimed by men in certain cases (for example, if their career was interrupted to care for children). Its amount would rise by an additional 10% in 2024 and 2025.
  6. Minimum pensions would be strengthened: from 2027, the minimum retirement pension with a dependent spouse could not fall below the poverty threshold for a two-adult household. Other minimum and non-contributory pensions would also rise progressively.
  7. Part-time work would count fully toward pensions regardless of hours worked, with improved rules for discontinuous permanent workers and self-employed workers. The first three years of leave to care for family members would also count as contributions.
  8. Students doing training or external academic internships, including university and vocational students, would be covered by Social Security, with a 95% reduction in common contingency contributions.

Who it affects

  • People close to retirement: Pension calculation rules change, with a more favorable option between 2026 and 2040.
  • High earners: They would pay a solidarity contribution on wages above the maximum base and contribute on a rising maximum base.
  • Women with irregular careers due to childcare: Better integration of contribution gaps and a higher gender gap supplement.
  • Recipients of minimum and non-contributory pensions: Their amounts would rise progressively above the poverty threshold.
  • Student interns and part-time workers: Internships would count under Social Security and part-time work would count fully toward pensions.

Words worth knowing

Base máxima de cotización (maximum contribution base)
The maximum amount of salary on which Social Security contributions are calculated.
Base reguladora (regulatory base)
The figure derived from contribution bases over a period, used to calculate the pension amount.
Fondo de Reserva de la Seguridad Social (Social Security reserve fund)
The Social Security piggy bank: money set aside to pay pensions when income falls short.
Pensión no contributiva (non-contributory pension)
A benefit for people with insufficient income who have not contributed enough for a regular pension.
Umbral de la pobreza (poverty threshold)
The income level below which a person or household is considered to live in poverty, according to the INE (Spanish statistics institute).

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced30 March 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted11 April 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments14 April 2023Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2023Apr 202311. 30 March 2023: Presentación22. 11 April 2023: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Publicación desde 11/04/2023 hasta 14/04/202333. 11 April 2023: Calificación44. 14 April 2023: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Enmiendas desde 14/04/2023 hasta 30/05/202355. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

18 May 2023

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 328 yes · 0 no

Voted on: Vote on the request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government Bill on urgent measures for the expansion of rights of pensioners, the reduction of the gender gap, and the establishment of a new framework for the sustainability of the public pension system (originating from Royal Decree-Law 2/2023, of March 16), submitted by the Plural Parliamentary Group (Mr. Boadella Esteve and Mr. Bel Accensi).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 74 of sitting 262· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano13
12 in favour · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
5 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto11
6 in favour · 5 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-gc33
27 in favour · 6 did not vote
GPlu12
10 in favour · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
49 in favour · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.