What it is
Bill would equalize labor and social security rights for domestic workers
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 29 September 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill to improve the working conditions and Social Security of workers in domestic service (originating from Royal Decree-Law 16/2022, of September 6).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000124· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would give household workers the same health and safety protection as other workers, with later regulatory development.
- It would include household employees under the coverage of the Wage Guarantee Fund, which pays compensation when the employer cannot, with a six-month cap for terminations under Article 11.2 of Royal Decree 1620/2011.
- It would remove the exclusion from unemployment benefits in the Special System for Domestic Employees, making unemployment contributions mandatory, and sets contribution bases for 2023.
- It would reform working conditions for domestic service: an unwritten contract would be presumed permanent and full time, and the contract could only end for justified causes, with twelve days of pay per year of service and twenty days of notice if service exceeded one year.
- It would establish contribution reductions and bonuses for employers: 20 percent for common contingencies and 80 percent for unemployment and the Wage Guarantee Fund, plus bonuses of 45 or 30 percent depending on the family's income and assets.
- It would add transport measures: extra deadlines to apply for public transport aid and refunds for users of AVANT multi-trip passes on the Ourense-A Coruña and Madrid-Salamanca routes, who could benefit from the 100 percent discount.
Who it affects
- Household workers (domestic employees): They would gain unemployment protection, Wage Guarantee Fund coverage, equal health and safety protection, and stronger protection against dismissal.
- Employers (families): They would have to contribute to unemployment and the Wage Guarantee Fund, though with reductions and bonuses on contributions.
- Public administrations and employment services: The State Public Employment Service would manage the bonuses and tax administrations would have to share information.
- Public transport and AVANT train users: They would have extra deadlines for aid and refunds on certain multi-trip passes.
Words worth knowing
- Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Wage Guarantee Fund)
- A public body that pays workers the compensation they are owed when the employer cannot pay.
- Sistema Especial para Empleados de Hogar (Special System for Domestic Employees)
- A scheme within Social Security with its own rules for people working in household service.
- Desistimiento (withdrawal)
- A rule that let the employer end the contract without giving any reason, paying compensation; the bill would remove it.
- Prestación por desempleo (unemployment benefit)
- A public payment received when you lose your job and have contributed before.
- Real decreto-ley (royal decree-law)
- A rule with the force of law that the Government can pass urgently; this text is now being processed as a bill.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced29 September 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 October 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments7 October 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
3 November 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the request by the Plural Parliamentary Group (Mr. Boadella i Esteve) for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government bill to improve working conditions and Social Security for domestic workers (originating from Royal Decree-Law 16/2022, of September 6).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 169 of sitting 213· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 31 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 35 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 did not vote |
| Mixto | 11 | 10 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 30 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000124
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 169 of sitting 213
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.