Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Legal protection for people reporting wrongdoing and corruption

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 16 September 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill regulating the protection of persons who report regulatory infringements and the fight against corruption.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000123· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The law protects people who report, in a work context, criminal or serious or very serious administrative offenses, as well as violations of European Union law. Good faith and a reasonable belief that the information is true are enough to be protected.
  2. Companies with 50 or more employees and many public entities must set up an internal reporting channel. Political parties, unions and business organizations that receive public funds must have one too, regardless of size.
  3. Reports can be made in writing, verbally or anonymously. The reporter's identity is kept confidential and can only be disclosed to the judiciary, the Public Prosecutor or the competent administrative authority.
  4. Retaliation against the reporter is prohibited, including dismissal, intimidation or unfavorable treatment. Retaliatory acts taken within the following two years are null and void and may lead to compensation.
  5. The Independent Whistleblower Protection Authority is created. It runs the external reporting channel, supports whistleblowers and punishes non-compliance. It is autonomous and independent from the Government.
  6. Violations can be punished with fines: from €1,001 to €300,000 for individuals and up to €1,000,000 for legal entities in the most serious cases. Failing to have an internal channel is a very serious offense.
  7. Obligated entities must set up the internal system within three months of the law taking effect; companies with 249 employees or fewer and municipalities under 10,000 residents have until December 1, 2023.
  8. A person involved in an administrative offense who reports it before the proceedings start can be exempted from the penalty, or see it reduced, if they stop the conduct, cooperate and repair the damage.

Who it affects

  • Workers and public employees: They can report offenses they learn about at work and are protected from retaliation.
  • Companies with 50 or more employees: They must have an internal reporting channel.
  • Public administrations and municipalities: All must have an internal reporting system, including small municipalities, which may share resources.
  • Parties, unions and foundations receiving public funds: They must create an internal reporting channel regardless of size.
  • People investigated after a report: They keep the presumption of innocence, the right to a defense and the confidentiality of their identity.

Words worth knowing

Represalia (retaliation)
Harm suffered for having reported something, such as dismissal, intimidation or unfavorable treatment.
Canal interno de información (internal reporting channel)
A mailbox or channel an organization sets up so its workers can report possible offenses.
Revelación pública (public disclosure)
Making an offense public, for example in the press or on social media, instead of using internal or external channels.
Potestad sancionadora (sanctioning power)
An authority's legal power to impose penalties.
A.A.I.
Autoridad Administrativa Independiente: an independent administrative authority, a public body autonomous from the Government.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced16 September 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted20 September 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments23 September 2022Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee3 November 2022A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary15 December 2022All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate22 December 2022The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE16 February 2023It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2022Oct 2022Nov 2022Dec 2022Jan 202311. 16 September 2022: Presentación22. 20 September 2022: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 20/09/2022 hasta 23/09/202233. 20 September 2022: Calificación44. 23 September 2022: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 23/09/2022 hasta 03/11/202255. 3 November 2022: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 03/11/2022 hasta 14/12/202266. 14 December 2022: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 14/12/2022 hasta 15/12/202277. 15 December 2022: Pleno Aprobación desde 15/12/2022 hasta 22/12/202288. 22 December 2022: Senado desde 22/12/2022 hasta 09/02/202399. 9 February 2023: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 09/02/2023 hasta 16/02/20231010. 16 February 2023: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 16/02/2023 hasta 07/03/2023

16 February 2023

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 196 yes · 144 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Remaining amendments.

This law had 44 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 21 of sitting 236· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 23 most voted in favour; in 15, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 23
  • Against: 15
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
11 in favour · 2 did not vote
Socialista119
117 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto11
5 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
32 in favour · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
11 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 against
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Law 2/2023, of February 20, regulating the protection of persons reporting regulatory infringements and the fight against corruption.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.